Literature DB >> 7661061

Early and 1-year survival rates in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a retrospective study comparing coronary angioplasty with medical treatment.

H Eltchaninoff1, C Simpfendorfer, I Franco, R E Raymond, P N Casale, P L Whitlow.   

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock remains a frequently lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction. Early revascularization of the infarct-related artery by coronary angioplasty has been suggested to significantly improve patient survival. In-hospital and 1-year survival was assessed in 50 patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. All patients received medical treatment and intraaortic balloon pump support. Thirty-three patients underwent coronary angioplasty (PTCA group), while 17 patients remained on conventional therapy (no PTCA group). The two groups were comparable for all baseline characteristics. Survival was significantly better in the PTCA group than in the no PTCA group: 64% versus 24% in-hospital survival (p = 0.007) and 52% versus 12% at 1 year (p = 0.006). When angioplasty was successful in achieving reperfusion, survival was further enhanced: in-hospital survival rate was 76% versus 25% in patients with unsuccessful angioplasty and 60% versus 25% at 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7661061     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90352-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: towards evidence based medical practice.

Authors:  S G Williams; D J Wright; L B Tan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Predictors of outcome after percutaneous treatment for cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  A G C Sutton; P Finn; J A Hall; A A Harcombe; R A Wright; M A de Belder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Cardiogenic shock: therapy and prevention.

Authors:  W L Barry; I J Sarembock
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Coronary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis: the dilemma of optimal reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  G Amit; A T Weiss; D Zahger
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Management and outcome of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without on-site catheterisation facilities.

Authors:  I M Barbash; S Behar; A Battler; D Hasdai; V Boyko; S Gottlieb; J Leor
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Thrombolysis and counterpulsation to improve survival in myocardial infarction complicated by hypotension and suspected cardiogenic shock or heart failure: results of the TACTICS Trial.

Authors:  E Magnus Ohman; John Nanas; Robert J Stomel; Massoud A Leesar; Dennis W T Nielsen; Daniel O'Dea; Felix J Rogers; Daniel Harber; Michael P Hudson; Elizabeth Fraulo; Linda K Shaw; Kerry L Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a single centre experience.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Subban; Anand Gnanaraj; Balashankar Gomathi; Ezhilan Janakiraman; Ulhas Pandurangi; Latchumanadhas Kalidoss; S Mullasari Ajit
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-04-28

Review 8.  Contemporary device management of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tariq Suleiman; Alexander Scott; David Tong; Vikram Khanna; Vijay Kunadian
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  A review of cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  L Khalid; S H Dhakam
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2008-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.