Literature DB >> 15710715

Predictors of outcome after percutaneous treatment for cardiogenic shock.

A G C Sutton1, P Finn, J A Hall, A A Harcombe, R A Wright, M A de Belder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine predictors of outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 113 patients undergoing emergency coronary angiography and attempted PCI for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in a regional cardiothoracic unit.
RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 51% (58 patients). Adverse outcome was associated with previous myocardial infarction, age over 70 years, cardiogenic shock complicating failure to respond to thrombolytic treatment (failed thrombolysis), and multivessel coronary artery disease. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the first three factors were independent predictors of in-hospital death with odds ratios of 5.21 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85 to 14.69), 4.02 (95% CI 1.14 to 14.12), and 3.78 (95% CI 1.43 to 9.96), respectively.
CONCLUSION: About 50% of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing a strategy of urgent coronary angiography and PCI survive to hospital discharge. Survivors do well in the subsequent six months. Emergency PCI for cardiogenic shock reduces mortality from an expected 80% to about 50%. Clinical features can help determine which patients are most likely to gain from urgent coronary angiography and attempted PCI. Alternative strategies are needed to improve the outcome of patients who fare badly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15710715      PMCID: PMC1768749          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2003.021691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  25 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Venu Menon; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm.

Authors:  Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Failure of thrombolysis by streptokinase: detection with a simple electrocardiographic method.

Authors:  A G Sutton; P G Campbell; D J Price; E D Grech; J A Hall; A Davies; M J Stewart; M A de Belder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI).

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Contemporary reperfusion therapy for cardiogenic shock: the GUSTO-I trial experience. The GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  D R Holmes; E R Bates; N S Kleiman; Z Sadowski; J H Horgan; D C Morris; R M Califf; P B Berger; E J Topol
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry.

Authors:  V Dzavik; L A Sleeper; T P Cocke; M Moscucci; J Saucedo; S Hosat; X Jiang; J Slater; T LeJemtel; J S Hochman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK trial.

Authors:  John G Webb; April M Lowe; Timothy A Sanborn; Harvey D White; Lynn A Sleeper; Ronald G Carere; Christopher E Buller; S Chiu Wong; Jean Boland; Vlad Dzavik; Mark Porway; Gordon Pate; Geoffrey Bergman; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  M D Hibbard; D R Holmes; K R Bailey; G S Reeder; J F Bresnahan; B J Gersh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  LINCS: L-NAME (a NO synthase inhibitor) in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Gad Cotter; Edo Kaluski; Olga Milo; Alex Blatt; Ahmed Salah; Alberto Hendler; Rikardo Krakover; Ahuva Golick; Zvi Vered
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  12 in total

1.  Cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndromes-miles to go?

Authors:  Salman Salahuddin; Balram Bhargava
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-04-28

2.  In-Hospital Tele-ECG Triage and Interventional Cardiologist Activation of the Infarct Team for STEMI Patients is Associated with Improved Late Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kuan-Chun Chen; Wei-Hsian Yin; Mason Shing Young; Jeng Wei
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 3.  Cardiogenic shock in ACS. Part 1: prediction, presentation and medical therapy.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Rajesh Kharbanda; Adrian P Banning
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  A severity scoring system for risk assessment of patients with cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial and Registry.

Authors:  Lynn A Sleeper; Harmony R Reynolds; Harvey D White; John G Webb; Vladimir Dzavík; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a single centre experience.

Authors:  Vijayakumar Subban; Anand Gnanaraj; Balashankar Gomathi; Ezhilan Janakiraman; Ulhas Pandurangi; Latchumanadhas Kalidoss; S Mullasari Ajit
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-04-28

6.  Prognostic Analysis for Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Mao-Jen Lin; Chun-Yu Chen; Hau-De Lin; Han-Ping Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Predictors of Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Deepak Acharya
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Cardiogenic shock after ST elevation myocardial infarction and IABP-SHOCK II risk score validation in a cohort treated with pharmacoinvasive strategy.

Authors:  Pedro Ivo M Moraes; Claudia Rodrigues Alves; Marco Tulio Souza; Suzi Emiko Kawakami; Iran Goncalves; Adriano Henrique Pereira Barbosa; Antonio Celio Moreno; Adriano Mendes Caixeta; Antonio Carlos Carvalho
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-07-29

9.  Predicting mortality in cardiogenic shock secondary to ACS requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support: The ACS-MCS score.

Authors:  Qussay Marashly; Iosif Taleb; Christos P Kyriakopoulos; Elizabeth Dranow; Tara L Jones; Anwar Tandar; Sean D Overton; Joseph E Tonna; Kathleen Stoddard; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Line Kemeyou; Antigone G Koliopoulou; Kevin S Shah; Kimiya Nourian; Tyler J Richins; Tyson S Burnham; Frederick G Welt; Stephen H McKellar; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention within 12 hours to 28 days of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a real-world Chinese population.

Authors:  Xingli Wu; Dingyou Yang; Yusheng Zhao; Caiyi Lu; Yu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.