Literature DB >> 7660584

Perceived motion of contrast-modulated gratings: predictions of the multi-channel gradient model and the role of full-wave rectification.

A Johnston1, C W Clifford.   

Abstract

The paper examines the perception of motion in contrast-modulated sine-wave grating patterns. These non-rigid motion patterns give rise to a spatially-structured motion percept in which perceived speed varies with spatial position. We measured the perceived motion of the low contrast regions of amplitude-modulated gratings as a function of the carrier frequency, the carrier speed, the shape of the modulation signal and the modulation depth. We found that for static carriers perceived speed was greatest in the low contrast regions of the display. The speed of the low contrast regions was underestimated and perceived speed decreased as the spatial frequency of the carrier increased. When the direction of the motion of the carrier was opposite to that of the contrast modulation, the low contrast regions could appear to be stationary. The perceived speed of the contrast modulation increased with modulation depth. The brightness contrast of the carrier grating had little effect on perceived speed of contrast-modulated patterns for average contrasts of over 10%. A motion model which had full-wave rectification as an explicit pre-processing stage followed by low-pass filtering or some other selection criterion, would predict that the motion of contrast-modulated gratings should appear rigid and that the motion of the envelope should be judged correctly. The Multi-channel Gradient Model however predicts both the structured motion field experienced when viewing these second-order motion patterns and the reductions in perceived speed as a function of carrier spatial frequency and carrier speed.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7660584     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00258-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Induced motion at texture-defined motion boundaries.

Authors:  A Johnston; C P Benton; P W McOwan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A new approach to analysing texture-defined motion.

Authors:  C P Benton; A Johnston
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Moving from spatially segregated to transparent motion: A modelling approach.

Authors:  Szonya Durant; Alejandra Donoso-Barrera; Sovira Tan; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Dissociation of first- and second-order motion systems by perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Charles Chubb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Auditory and tactile signals combine to influence vision during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Maria Concetta Morrone; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Transitions between central and peripheral vision create spatial/temporal distortions: a hypothesis concerning the perceived break of the curveball.

Authors:  Arthur Shapiro; Zhong-Lin Lu; Chang-Bing Huang; Emily Knight; Robert Ennis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  FPGA-based multimodal embedded sensor system integrating low- and mid-level vision.

Authors:  Guillermo Botella; José Antonio Martín H; Matilde Santos; Uwe Meyer-Baese
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Implementation of a low-cost mobile devices to support medical diagnosis.

Authors:  Carlos García Sánchez; Guillermo Botella Juan; Fermín Ayuso Márquez; Diego González Rodríguez; Manuel Prieto-Matías; Francisco Tirado Fernández
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.