Literature DB >> 7656506

Pharmacokinetic aspects of digoxin-specific Fab therapy in the management of digitalis toxicity.

M R Ujhelyi1, S Robert.   

Abstract

Digoxin intoxication occurs frequently and may require treatment with digoxin-specific Fab therapy. Little is known, however, regarding the biological fate of this compound. Pharmacokinetic studies have not been performed in healthy volunteers, but there are limited kinetic data from patients who have received therapy for the treatment of digoxin toxicity. Digoxin-specific Fab is eliminated via renal and nonrenal routes, having a volume of distribution slightly exceeding extracellular volume (0.40 L/kg) and an elimination half-life of 16 to 20 hours. Patients with renal impairment and end-stage renal disease have elimination half-life values that are prolonged up to 10-fold in magnitude, while volume of distribution is unaffected. Systemic clearance of digoxin-specific Fab is approximately 0.32 ml/min/kg in digoxin-toxic patients with preserved renal function. Renal failure also decreases Fab clearance by up to 75%. Therefore, Fab may reside in the serum of anephric patients for 2 to 3 weeks after administration. More important is the effect of Fab on the disposition of digoxin. Because digoxin-specific Fab has a stronger digoxin-binding affinity than do biological membranes, it can sequester tissue-bound and intracellular digoxin into the extracellular spaces. This results in a rapid increase in digoxin serum concentrations in the central compartment. Since the majority of digoxin is bound by Fab, it cannot interact with its biological receptor and thus reverses digoxin toxicity. The pharmacokinetic fate of total digoxin after administration of digoxin-specific Fab follows that of Fab. However, it appears that the elimination half-life of Fab is slightly shorter than that of total digoxin in patients with end-stage renal disease, suggesting that the clearance of Fab is slightly faster than that of total digoxin. Free digoxin concentrations fall rapidly after Fab administration and then rebound upwards within 12 to 24 hours. This rebound in free digoxin concentrations, however, is delayed by 12 to 130 hours in patients with renal dysfunction and end-stage renal disease. Rebound in free digoxin concentrations occurs during the initial phase of the biexponential decline of the serum concentration-time profile for digoxin-specific Fab, suggesting that distribution from the vascular spaces is the likely cause. Following the increase, free digoxin concentrations decline in a manner that is dependent on renal and nonrenal routes of elimination. During this time period it is evident that Fab retains it capability of binding digoxin while it resides in plasma. There is no evidence to support a dissociation between the Fab-digoxin complex over extended periods of time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7656506     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199528060-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  38 in total

1.  Determination of free serum digoxin concentrations in digoxin toxic patients after administration of digoxin fab antibodies.

Authors:  M R Ujhelyi; P J Green; D M Cummings; S Robert; P H Vlasses; B J Zarowitz
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Retreatment with digoxin immune Fab.

Authors:  N M Allen
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1991-11

3.  Monitoring serum digoxin concentrations during digoxin immune Fab therapy.

Authors:  M R Ujhelyi; R D Colucci; D M Cummings; P J Green; S Robert; P H Vlasses; B J Zarowitz
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991-10

4.  Reversal of advanced digoxin intoxication with Fab fragments of digoxin-specific antibodies.

Authors:  T W Smith; E Haber; L Yeatman; V P Butler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Kinetics of the Fab fragments of digoxin antibodies and of bound digoxin in patients with severe digoxin intoxication.

Authors:  W Schaumann; B Kaufmann; P Neubert; A Smolarz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Determination of free digoxin concentrations in serum for monitoring Fab treatment of digoxin overdose.

Authors:  M J Hursting; V A Raisys; K E Opheim; J L Bell; G B Trobaugh; T W Smith
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Digoxin-like immunoreactivity eliminated from serum by centrifugal ultrafiltration before fluorescence polarization immunoassay of digoxin.

Authors:  R H Christenson; S D Studenberg; S Beck-Davis; F A Sedor
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Treatment of 63 severely digitalis-toxic patients with digoxin-specific antibody fragments.

Authors:  T L Wenger; V P Butler; E Haber; T W Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Effects of digoxin immune Fab (ovine) on digoxin immunoassays.

Authors:  P M Rainey
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Clinical and pharmacokinetic profiles of digoxin immune Fab in four patients with renal impairment.

Authors:  N M Allen; G D Dunham; J M Sailstad; J W Findlay
Journal:  DICP       Date:  1991-12
View more
  13 in total

1.  Predicting the clinical efficacy and potential adverse effects of a humanized anticocaine monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  Andrew B Norman; William J Ball
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Investigation of the pharmacokinetics of romiplostim in rodents with a focus on the clearance mechanism.

Authors:  Yow-Ming C Wang; Bethlyn Sloey; Teresa Wong; Prerna Khandelwal; Rebeca Melara; Yu-Nien Sun
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  PK/TD modeling for prediction of the effects of 8C2, an anti-topotecan mAb, on topotecan-induced toxicity in mice.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.875

Review 4.  Fab antibody fragments: some applications in clinical toxicology.

Authors:  Robert J Flanagan; Alison L Jones
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Advances in the management of digoxin toxicity in the older patient.

Authors:  S W Borron; C Bismuth; J Muszynski
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Interspecies scaling and prediction of human clearance: comparison of small- and macro-molecule drugs.

Authors:  Yeamin Huh; David E Smith; Meihau Rose Feng
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 1.908

7.  Neutralizing activity and protective immunity to ricin toxin conferred by B subunit (RTB)-specific Fab fragments.

Authors:  Anastasiya Yermakova; Nicholas J Mantis
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 8.  Management of digoxin toxicity.

Authors:  Matthew Pincus
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2016-02-01

Review 9.  Assessment of disulfide and hinge modifications in monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Bernd Moritz; Jan Olaf Stracke
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 10.  The prince and the pauper. A tale of anticancer targeted agents.

Authors:  Alfonso Dueñas-González; Patricia García-López; Luis Alonso Herrera; Jose Luis Medina-Franco; Aurora González-Fierro; Myrna Candelaria
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.