Literature DB >> 7654167

Marital interaction coding system: revision and empirical evaluation.

R E Heyman1, R L Weiss, J M Eddy.   

Abstract

Given the vast amount of codeable information in marital interactions, observational coding systems must emphasize particular classes of behavior. The most widely used marital coding scheme, the Marital Interaction Coding System (MICS), like many older behavioral coding systems, emphasizes verbal content over affect. Changes made to the MICS between versions III and IV are described; they were intended to increase the system's use of coded affect and to decrease autodependence in sequential analysis. We used an archival data set of 994 couples' videotaped conflict negotiations coded with the MICS. As intended, the MICS-IV, relative to the MICS-III, was found to have the advantage of capturing more non-verbal affect expressed during marital interactions, which resulted in stronger interactional contingencies (e.g. Wife Blame-->Husband Blame, Husband Facilitation-->Wife Facilitation). The MICS-IV also yielded significantly lower levels of spurious autodependence.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7654167     DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00003-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  20 in total

Review 1.  Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.

Authors:  R E Heyman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  The nuts and bolts of behavioral observation of marital and family interaction.

Authors:  G Margolin; P H Oliver; E B Gordis; H G O'Hearn; A M Medina; C M Ghosh; L Morland
Journal:  Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-12

3.  Older spouses' cortisol responses to marital conflict: associations with demand/withdraw communication patterns.

Authors:  Kathi L Heffner; Timothy J Loving; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser; Lina K Himawan; Ronald Glaser; William B Malarkey
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-06-20

4.  How much observational data is enough? An empirical test using marital interaction coding.

Authors:  R E Heyman; B R Chaudhry; D Treboux; J Crowell; C Lord; D Vivian; E B Waters
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2001

5.  Effects of administered alcohol on intimate partner interactions in a conflict resolution paradigm.

Authors:  Maria Testa; Cory A Crane; Brian M Quigley; Ash Levitt; Kenneth E Leonard
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Conceptual and statistical issues in couples observational research: Rationale and methods for design decisions.

Authors:  Brian R W Baucom; Karena Leo; Colin Adamo; Panayiotis Georgiou; Katherine J W Baucom
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  The Proximal Effects of Acute Alcohol Consumption on Male-to-Female Aggression: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Experimental Literature.

Authors:  Cory A Crane; Stephanie A Godleski; Sarahmona M Przybyla; Robert C Schlauch; Maria Testa
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2015-05-24

Review 8.  Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Theodore F Robles; Richard B Slatcher; Joseph M Trombello; Meghan M McGinn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  From a distance: implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection.

Authors:  Ozlem Ayduk; Ethan Kross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-05

10.  PTSD and conflict behavior between veterans and their intimate partners.

Authors:  Mark W Miller; Erika J Wolf; Annemarie F Reardon; Kelly M Harrington; Karen Ryabchenko; Diane Castillo; Rachel Freund; Richard E Heyman
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2013-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.