Literature DB >> 16733528

How much observational data is enough? An empirical test using marital interaction coding.

R E Heyman1, B R Chaudhry, D Treboux, J Crowell, C Lord, D Vivian, E B Waters.   

Abstract

Using three different samples of couples (clinic, nondistressed community, and engaged), we found that 15 minutes was sufficient to witness enough behavior to make reliable (i.e., internally consistent) estimations of most Rapid Marital Interaction Coding System (Heyman & Vivian, 1993) code frequencies. Ten minutes is sufficient for many codes of interest. The ease in which "how much time is necessary" calculations can be made should entice behavioral investigators from a variety of content areas to publish such figures. By empirically investigating a factor that in most fields becomes reified through convention, investigators can conduct observational research that is both maximally efficient and maximally scientifically defensible.

Year:  2001        PMID: 16733528      PMCID: PMC1470835          DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(01)80047-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ther        ISSN: 0005-7894


  10 in total

Review 1.  Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.

Authors:  R E Heyman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-03

2.  Couples' shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality.

Authors:  A Aron; C C Norman; E N Aron; C McKenna; R E Heyman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-02

3.  Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.

Authors:  N S Jacobson; P Truax
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1991-02

4.  A review of the observational data-collection and reliability procedures reported in The Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

Authors:  M B Kelly
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1977

5.  Generalized versus spouse-specific anger/hostility and men's violence against intimates.

Authors:  D J Boyle; D Vivian
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  1996

6.  Affective responses to conflictual discussions in violent and nonviolent couples.

Authors:  G Margolin; R S John; L Gleberman
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-02

7.  Marital interaction coding system: revision and empirical evaluation.

Authors:  R E Heyman; R L Weiss; J M Eddy
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1995-07

8.  Generalizability theory and the coding of marital interactions.

Authors:  G B Wieder; R L Weiss
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1980-08

9.  Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict.

Authors:  A Christensen; C L Heavey
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-07

10.  Are bi-directionally violent couples mutually victimized? A gender-sensitive comparison.

Authors:  D Vivian; J Langhinrichsen-Rohling
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  1994
  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.

Authors:  R E Heyman
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2001-03

2.  Generalizability Issues in Observational Studies of Couples: Sample Characteristics and Task Design.

Authors:  Hyoun K Kim; Deborah M Capaldi
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2007-02

3.  Conceptual and statistical issues in couples observational research: Rationale and methods for design decisions.

Authors:  Brian R W Baucom; Karena Leo; Colin Adamo; Panayiotis Georgiou; Katherine J W Baucom
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2017-12

4.  Observed Relationship Behaviors and Sleep in Military Veterans and Their Partners.

Authors:  Jennifer Fillo; Stephanie Brooks Holliday; Amy DeSantis; Anne Germain; Daniel J Buysse; Karen A Matthews; Wendy M Troxel
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2017-12

5.  The lump-versus-split dilemma in couple observational coding: A multisite analysis of rapid marital interaction coding system data.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Amy K Otto; Maija Reblin; Alexandra K Wojda; Shu Xu
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2020-11-12

6.  Predicting couple therapy outcomes based on speech acoustic features.

Authors:  Md Nasir; Brian Robert Baucom; Panayiotis Georgiou; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Linking emotions to behaviors through deep transfer learning.

Authors:  Haoqi Li; Brian Baucom; Panayiotis Georgiou
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2020-01-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.