Literature DB >> 7653451

Comparison of sotalol with digoxin-quinidine for conversion of acute atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm (the Sotalol-Digoxin-Quinidine Trial).

M O Halinen1, M Huttunen, S Paakkinen, L Tarssanen.   

Abstract

We randomized 61 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ( < 48 hours from onset) to either sotalol or quinidine treatment. Conversion of rhythm was recorded by Holter monitoring. The starting 80 mg dose of sotalol was repeated at 2, 6, and 10 hours if AF persisted (heart rate > 80 beats/min), and if systolic blood was > or = 120 mm Hg. In the quinidine group, if heart rate > 100 beats/min, it was decreased with intravenous digoxin, whereafter 200 mg of oral quinidine sulfate was given maximally 3 times, each dose 2 hours apart. Conversion of AF to sinus rhythm occurred in 17 or 33 patients (52%) taking sotalol, and in 24 of 28 patients (86%) taking quinidine (p < 0.0001). Electric cardioversion was necessary in 39% of the former and in 14% of the latter group. The mean delay from first trial drug to sinus rhythm with the trial medication was 10.2 +/- 7.6 hours in the sotalol group and 4.0 +/- 2.9 hours in the quinidine group (p < 0.01). Treatment was discontinued in 16 patients taking sotalol (48%) because of asymptomatic bradycardia or hypotension, and in 20 taking quinidine (71%) because of rhythm conversion. Asymptomatic wide complex tachycardia (QRS > 0.12 second) was found in 13% and 27% of patients taking sotalol and quinidine, respectively. The longest RR intervals were 6.4 and 3.8 seconds in the sotalol and quinidine groups, respectively. Oral sotalol did not appear as effective as quinidine sulfate treatment in conversion of paroxysmal AF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7653451     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80137-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  A review of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of newer antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; Deborah L Wolbrette; Luna Bhatta; Mazhar Khan; John Hynes; Soraya Samii; Jerry Luck
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  The role of digitalis pharmacokinetics in converting atrial fibrillation and flutter to regular sinus rhythm.

Authors:  Roger W Jelliffe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Atrial fibrillation (acute onset).

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Stavros Apostolakis
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-02-15

4.  Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic agents at promoting sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  G Nichol; F McAlister; B Pham; A Laupacis; B Shea; M Green; A Tang; G Wells
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: current management and treatment options.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Igor Diemberger; Mauro Biffi; Cristian Martignani; Angelo Branzi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Atrial fibrillation (acute onset).

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Timothy Watson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-05-02

7.  Quinidine for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a retrospective analysis in 501 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Bernhard Schwaab; Alexander Katalinic; Uta Maria Böge; Jürgen Loh; Peter Blank; Tatjana Kölzow; Dirk Poppe; Hendrik Bonnemeier
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 8.  Drug-induced cardiac arrhythmias: incidence, prevention and management.

Authors:  J C Doig
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.228

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.