Literature DB >> 7651385

A domain of the even-skipped protein represses transcription by preventing TFIID binding to a promoter: repression by cooperative blocking.

R J Austin1, M D Biggin.   

Abstract

We examined the mechanism by which the C-terminal 236 amino acids of the even-skipped protein (region CD) repress transcription. A fusion protein, CDGB, was created that contains region CD fused to the glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain. This protein repressed transcription in an in vitro system containing purified fractions of the RNA polymerase II general transcription factors, and repression was dependent upon the presence of high-affinity glucocorticoid receptor binding sites in the promoter. Repression by CDGB was prevented when the promoter DNA was preincubated with TFIID or TBP, whereas preincubation of the template DNA with CDGB prevented TFIID binding. Together, these results strongly imply that CDGB represses transcription by inhibiting TFIID binding, and further experiments suggested a mechanism by which this may occur. Region CD can mediate cooperative interactions between repressor molecules such that molecules bound at the glucocorticoid receptor binding sites stabilize binding of additional CDGB molecules to low-affinity binding sites throughout the basal promoter. Binding to some of these low-affinity sites was shown to contribute to repression. Further experiments suggested that the full-length eve protein also represses transcription by the same mechanism. We speculate that occupancy of secondary sites within the basal promoter by CDGB or the eve protein inhibits subsequent TFIID binding to repress transcription, a mechanism we term cooperative blocking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7651385      PMCID: PMC230711          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.15.9.4683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  54 in total

1.  Differential regulation of transcription preinitiation complex assembly by activator and repressor homeo domain proteins.

Authors:  F B Johnson; M A Krasnow
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Functional analysis of Drosophila transcription factor IIB.

Authors:  S L Wampler; J T Kadonaga
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  A short, disordered protein region mediates interactions between the homeodomain of the yeast alpha 2 protein and the MCM1 protein.

Authors:  A K Vershon; A D Johnson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Assembly of recombinant TFIID reveals differential coactivator requirements for distinct transcriptional activators.

Authors:  J L Chen; L D Attardi; C P Verrijzer; K Yokomori; R Tjian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-10-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  TFIID sequence recognition of the initiator and sequences farther downstream in Drosophila class II genes.

Authors:  B A Purnell; P A Emanuel; D S Gilmour
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional co-repressor complex.

Authors:  D Tzamarias; K Struhl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Contacts between DNA gyrase and its binding site on DNA: features of symmetry and asymmetry revealed by protection from nucleases.

Authors:  A Morrison; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Dr1, a TATA-binding protein-associated phosphoprotein and inhibitor of class II gene transcription.

Authors:  J A Inostroza; F H Mermelstein; I Ha; W S Lane; D Reinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Two homeo domain proteins bind with similar specificity to a wide range of DNA sites in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  J Walter; C A Dever; M D Biggin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Structure-function analysis of the TBP-binding protein Dr1 reveals a mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription.

Authors:  K C Yeung; J A Inostroza; F H Mermelstein; C Kannabiran; D Reinberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  25 in total

1.  Drosophila Mediator complex is broadly utilized by diverse gene-specific transcription factors at different types of core promoters.

Authors:  J M Park; B S Gim; J M Kim; J H Yoon; H S Kim; J G Kang; Y J Kim
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Evolutionary conserved mechanism of transcriptional repression by even-skipped.

Authors:  L M McKay; B Carpenter; S G Roberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Corepressor required for adenovirus E1B 55,000-molecular-weight protein repression of basal transcription.

Authors:  M E Martin; A J Berk
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  The Rpd3 histone deacetylase is required for segmentation of the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  M Mannervik; M Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Drawing lines in the sand: even skipped et al. and parasegment boundaries.

Authors:  James B Jaynes; Miki Fujioka
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Transcriptional corepression in vitro: a Mot1p-associated form of TATA-binding protein is required for repression by Leu3p.

Authors:  P A Wade; J A Jaehning
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 3C is a powerful repressor of transcription when tethered to DNA.

Authors:  M Bain; R J Watson; P J Farrell; M J Allday
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  YY1 and c-Myc associate in vivo in a manner that depends on c-Myc levels.

Authors:  A Shrivastava; J Yu; S Artandi; K Calame
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Adenovirus E1B 55K represses p53 activation in vitro.

Authors:  M E Martin; A J Berk
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  The human cut homeodomain protein can repress gene expression by two distinct mechanisms: active repression and competition for binding site occupancy.

Authors:  F Mailly; G Bérubé; R Harada; P L Mao; S Phillips; A Nepveu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.