Literature DB >> 1358759

Differential regulation of transcription preinitiation complex assembly by activator and repressor homeo domain proteins.

F B Johnson1, M A Krasnow.   

Abstract

Different eukaryotic transcription factors can act through the same upstream binding site to differentially regulate target gene expression, but little is known of the underlying mechanisms. Here, we show that Ultrabithorax and even-skipped homeo domain proteins (UBX and EVE) of Drosophila melanogaster exert active and opposite effects on in vitro transcription when bound to a common site upstream of a core promoter. Both the activator UBX and the repressor EVE affect the extent but not the rate constant of preinitiation complex (preIC) formation. Both regulators act early in preIC assembly and are dispensable later. Assembling complexes become resistant to regulation by the bound proteins, but activation by UBX is restored upon ATP or dATP addition, and regulation by both proteins is restored after the addition of all four nucleoside triphosphates and transcription initiation. The results establish that upstream activators and repressors can function by fundamentally similar mechanisms, by differentially regulating an early step in preIC assembly, leading to formation of functionally distinct transcription complexes. A subsequent step renders mature complexes transiently refractory to activation and repression. Implications for the mechanism of transcription complex assembly and turnover and its regulation are discussed, including a new role for ATP in turnover.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1358759     DOI: 10.1101/gad.6.11.2177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  30 in total

1.  Evolutionary conserved mechanism of transcriptional repression by even-skipped.

Authors:  L M McKay; B Carpenter; S G Roberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Mechanism by which the IFN-beta enhanceosome activates transcription.

Authors:  J Yie; K Senger; D Thanos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Molecular cloning of the human UMP synthase gene and characterization of point mutations in two hereditary orotic aciduria families.

Authors:  M Suchi; H Mizuno; Y Kawai; T Tsuboi; S Sumi; K Okajima; M E Hodgson; H Ogawa; Y Wada
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  RNA polymerase II transcription complex assembly in nuclear extracts.

Authors:  C M Bral; J W Steinke; C J Kang; D O Peterson
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1998

5.  Transcription activation by GC-boxes: evaluation of kinetic and equilibrium contributions.

Authors:  D Yean; J Gralla
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Transcription reinitiation rate: a special role for the TATA box.

Authors:  D Yean; J Gralla
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Mapping and mutagenesis of the amino-terminal transcriptional repression domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein.

Authors:  J D Licht; W Hanna-Rose; J C Reddy; M A English; M Ro; M Grossel; R Shaknovich; U Hansen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Herpes simplex virus type 1 recombination: the Uc-DR1 region is required for high-level a-sequence-mediated recombination.

Authors:  R E Dutch; B V Zemelman; I R Lehman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Cooperative DNA binding of the human HoxB5 (Hox-2.1) protein is under redox regulation in vitro.

Authors:  C K Galang; C A Hauser
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Glucagon gene expression is negatively regulated by hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 beta.

Authors:  J Philippe; C Morel; V R Prezioso
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.