Literature DB >> 7649004

Topography of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

R Kakigi1, S Koyama, M Hoshiyama, M Shimojo, Y Kitamura, S Watanabe.   

Abstract

The topography of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following stimulation of the right and left posterior tibial nerves was investigated in 5 normal subjects (10 nerves). The main deflections N37m-P45m-N60m-P75m and their counterparts P37m-N45m-P60m-N75m were identified in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated nerve. Their equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) were located in the foot area of the primary sensory cortex (SI), probably in area 3b. Restricted minor deflections, P40m-N40m and N50m-P50m, were considered to be generated in area 1 in SI. As the generator sources of P37m-N37m, P40m-N40m and N45m-P45m were temporarily changed and interfered with each other, the direction of ECDs appeared to be rotated with the passage of time. Small middle-latency deflections, N100m-P100m, were clearly identified in 2 subjects. ECDs of these deflections were found in the second sensory cortex (SII), in both hemispheres, although they were clearer in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated nerve. In conclusion, short- and middle-latency SEFs are mainly generated in area 3b in SI contralateral to the stimulated nerve, and responses generated in area 1 of SI and SII affect the SEFs to some degree, but interindividual differences are large compared with SEFs evoked by upper limb stimulation.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7649004     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00053-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  9 in total

Review 1.  Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing.

Authors:  R Hari; N Forss
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Changes in the centrifugal gating effect on somatosensory evoked potentials depending on the level of contractile force.

Authors:  T Wasaka; H Nakata; T Kida; R Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Somatosensory evoked potentials and blood lactate levels.

Authors:  Valentina Perciavalle; Giovanna Alagona; Giulia De Maria; Giuseppe Rapisarda; Erminio Costanzo; Vincenzo Perciavalle; Marinella Coco
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Difference in somatosensory evoked fields elicited by mechanical and electrical stimulations: Elucidation of the human homunculus by a noninvasive method.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; Takushi Shirai; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Akira Hashizume; Toshihide Harada; Yasuyo Mimori; Masayasu Matsumoto
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Localized N20 Component of Somatosensory Evoked Magnetic Fields in Frontoparietal Brain Tumor Patients Using Noise-Normalized Approaches.

Authors:  Nor Safira Elaina; Aamir Saeed Malik; Wafaa Khazaal Shams; Nasreen Badruddin; Jafri Malin Abdullah; Mohammad Faruque Reza
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Magnetoencephalographic study of hand and foot sensorimotor organization in 325 consecutive patients evaluated for tumor or epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Ronald B Willemse; Arjan Hillebrand; Hanneke E Ronner; W Peter Vandertop; Cornelis J Stam
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation shows no effect on paired stimulation suppression of the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Jan H Bettmann; Christine H Meyer-Frießem; Lauren M Schweizer; Lara Schlaffke; Peter K Zahn; Martin Tegenthoff; Oliver Höffken
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation attenuates somatosensory evoked potentials from the lower limb.

Authors:  Christopher M Zapallow; Michael J Asmussen; David A E Bolton; Kevin G H Lee; Mark F Jacobs; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials as a Marker of Functional Neuroplasticity in Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tom Maudrich; Susanne Hähner; Rouven Kenville; Patrick Ragert
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.