Literature DB >> 28116447

Localized N20 Component of Somatosensory Evoked Magnetic Fields in Frontoparietal Brain Tumor Patients Using Noise-Normalized Approaches.

Nor Safira Elaina1, Aamir Saeed Malik2, Wafaa Khazaal Shams1, Nasreen Badruddin1, Jafri Malin Abdullah3, Mohammad Faruque Reza3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To localize sensorimotor cortical activation in 10 patients with frontoparietal tumors using quantitative magnetoencephalography (MEG) with noise-normalized approaches.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) were elicited in 10 patients with somatosensory tumors and in 10 control participants using electrical stimulation of the median nerve via the right and left wrists. We localized the N20m component of the SEFs using dynamic statistical parametric mapping (dSPM) and standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) combined with 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The obtained coordinates were compared between groups. Finally, we statistically evaluated the N20m parameters across hemispheres using non-parametric statistical tests.
RESULTS: The N20m sources were accurately localized to Brodmann area 3b in all members of the control group and in seven of the patients; however, the sources were shifted in three patients relative to locations outside the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). Compared with the affected (tumor) hemispheres in the patient group, N20m amplitudes and the strengths of the current sources were significantly lower in the unaffected hemispheres and in both hemispheres of the control group. These results were consistent for both dSPM and sLORETA approaches.
CONCLUSION: Tumors in the sensorimotor cortex lead to cortical functional reorganization and an increase in N20m amplitude and current-source strengths. Noise-normalized approaches for MEG analysis that are integrated with MRI show accurate and reliable localization of sensorimotor function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brodmann area 3b; Frontoparietal tumor; Magnetoencephalography; Noise-normalized approach; Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28116447     DOI: 10.1007/s00062-017-0557-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1869-1439            Impact factor:   3.649


  64 in total

1.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity.

Authors:  A M Dale; A K Liu; B R Fischl; R L Buckner; J W Belliveau; J D Lewine; E Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Can magnetoencephalography track the afferent information flow along white matter thalamo-cortical fibers?

Authors:  Christos Papadelis; Elisa Leonardelli; Martin Staudt; Christoph Braun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Aging changes and gender differences in response to median nerve stimulation measured with MEG.

Authors:  Julia M Stephen; Doug Ranken; Elaine Best; John Adair; Janice Knoefel; Sanja Kovacevic; Denise Padilla; Blaine Hart; Cheryl J Aine
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.

Authors:  Dahlia Sharon; Matti S Hämäläinen; Roger B H Tootell; Eric Halgren; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

6.  Topography of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  R Kakigi; S Koyama; M Hoshiyama; M Shimojo; Y Kitamura; S Watanabe
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-08

7.  Combining fMRI and MEG increases the reliability of presurgical language localization: a clinical study on the difference between and congruence of both modalities.

Authors:  Peter Grummich; Christopher Nimsky; Elisabeth Pauli; Michael Buchfelder; Oliver Ganslandt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following median nerve stimulation.

Authors:  R Kakigi
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.304

Review 9.  Magnetoencephalography in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Jyrki P Mäkelä; Nina Forss; Juha Jääskeläinen; Erika Kirveskari; Antti Korvenoja; Ritva Paetau
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Effects of age, gender, and stimulus side on the scalp topography of somatosensory evoked potentials following posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

Authors:  R Kakigi; H Shibasaki
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.