Literature DB >> 7646158

Mechanical properties of porcine pulmonary valve leaflets: how do they differ from aortic leaflets?

G W Christie1, B G Barratt-Boyes.   

Abstract

This study measured the biaxial properties of pulmonary and aortic leaflets in extension in the fresh state and then in the same samples after fixation with glutaraldehyde. The results showed that when fresh, the valves had a similar response to load in the circumferential direction, but the pulmonary leaflets were more extensible in the radial direction. They were also less stiff. Fixation decreased the tissue extensibility and increased the stiffness of the pulmonary leaflets much less than in the aortic leaflets. This was interpreted to mean that the collagen content of the pulmonary leaflets is significantly less than that in the aortic leaflets. Reduced collagen content would be expected to enhance hemodynamic performance because of increased leaflet stretch and reduced stiffness. However, lower collagen levels may reduce implant durability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7646158     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00279-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  17 in total

Review 1.  Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The time has come to extend the expiration limit of cryopreserved allograft heart valves.

Authors:  Jan Burkert; Petra Kochová; Zbyněk Tonar; Robert Cimrman; Tereza Blassová; Ramadan Jashari; Radovan Fiala; Jaroslav Špatenka
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 3.  Heart Valve Biomechanics and Underlying Mechanobiology.

Authors:  Salma Ayoub; Giovanni Ferrari; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Frederick J Schoen; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.090

4.  Prediction of matrix-to-cell stress transfer in heart valve tissues.

Authors:  Siyao Huang; Hsiao-Ying Shadow Huang
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 1.365

5.  GENE EXPRESSION AND COLLAGEN FIBER MICROMECHANICAL INTERACTIONS OF THE SEMILUNAR HEART VALVE INTERSTITIAL CELL.

Authors:  Christopher A Carruthers; Christina M Alfieri; Erinn M Joyce; Simon C Watkins; Katherine E Yutzey; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.321

Review 6.  Review of molecular and mechanical interactions in the aortic valve and aorta: implications for the shared pathogenesis of aortic valve disease and aortopathy.

Authors:  Varun K Krishnamurthy; Richard C Godby; G R Liu; J Michael Smith; Loren F Hiratzka; Daria A Narmoneva; Robert B Hinton
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Biomechanical Behavior of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Heterograft Tissues: Characterization, Simulation, and Performance.

Authors:  Joao S Soares; Kristen R Feaver; Will Zhang; David Kamensky; Ankush Aggarwal; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.495

8.  Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds.

Authors:  L A Hockaday; K H Kang; N W Colangelo; P Y C Cheung; B Duan; E Malone; J Wu; L N Girardi; L J Bonassar; H Lipson; C C Chu; J T Butcher
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 9.954

9.  Functional collagen fiber architecture of the pulmonary heart valve cusp.

Authors:  Erinn M Joyce; Jun Liao; Frederick J Schoen; John E Mayer; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Tubular heart valves from decellularized engineered tissue.

Authors:  Zeeshan H Syedain; Lee A Meier; Jay M Reimer; Robert T Tranquillo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.