Literature DB >> 7644719

Benchmark Dose Workshop: criteria for use of a benchmark dose to estimate a reference dose.

D G Barnes1, G P Daston, J S Evans, A M Jarabek, R J Kavlock, C A Kimmel, C Park, H L Spitzer.   

Abstract

The purpose of the Benchmark Dose Workshop was to assess the feasibility and implications of replacing the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) with a benchmark dose (BMD) when deriving reference doses and concentrations (RfDs and RfCs). The workshop participants supported the use of the BMD method to remove many of the limitations inherent in using the NOAEL approach. Participants endorsed in general the use of a BMD for all quantal noncancer health effects and endorsed in particular the BMD for assessing developmental toxicity based on data presented at the workshop. The discussions of implementation recognized the need to demonstrate that changing from a NOAEL to a BMD gives the risk manager more certain information on which to base decisions. Most participants agreed that the current NOAEL-derived RfDs and RfCs are sufficiently protective and should only be changed as data become available for estimating a BMD. It was recognized that to achieve general acceptance of the BMD approach, it will have to be applied to a variety of endpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7644719     DOI: 10.1006/rtph.1995.1043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  16 in total

1.  Determination of the di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate NOAEL for reproductive development in the rat: importance of the retention of extra animals to adulthood.

Authors:  Chad R Blystone; Grace E Kissling; Jack B Bishop; Robert E Chapin; Gary W Wolfe; Paul M D Foster
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Benchmark dose estimation for coke oven emissions based on oxidative damage in Chinese exposed workers.

Authors:  Kaili Zou; Pengpeng Wang; Xiaoran Duan; Yongli Yang; Hui Zhang; Sihua Wang; Liuhua Shi; Yanbin Wang; Wu Yao; Wei Wang
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Translational benchmark risk analysis.

Authors:  Walter W Piegorsch
Journal:  J Risk Res       Date:  2010-07

Review 4.  The road to embryologically based dose-response models.

Authors:  R J Kavlock; R W Setzer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Fundamentals and possibilities of classification of occupational substances as developmental toxicants.

Authors:  A Hofmann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Assessment of potential risk levels associated with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reference values.

Authors:  Rosemary Castorina; Tracey J Woodruff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Evaluating noncancer effects of trichloroethylene: dosimetry, mode of action, and risk assessment.

Authors:  H A Barton; H J Clewell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Benchmark concentrations for methylmercury obtained from the Seychelles Child Development Study.

Authors:  K S Crump; C Van Landingham; C Shamlaye; C Cox; P W Davidson; G J Myers; T W Clarkson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Low-dose agrochemicals and lawn-care pesticides induce developmental toxicity in murine preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Anne R Greenlee; Tammy M Ellis; Richard L Berg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.

Authors:  J McCann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.