Literature DB >> 7643635

Utilization and outcomes of surgical gastrostomies and jejunostomies in an era of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a population-based study.

L R Bergstrom1, D e Larson, A R Zinsmeister, M G Sarr, M D Silverstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the indications for use of surgical gastrostomy (SG) and surgical jejunostomy (SJ) as feeding tubes, the complications, and the trends in the use of SG and SJ after the introduction of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) at our institution in 1981.
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, who received surgically placed feeding tubes between 1976 and 1989.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical records of all Olmsted County residents with surgical placement of a feeding tube during the designated study period were reviewed, and underlying conditions, complications, and survival were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of 77 adult patients (mean age, 66 years; 48% women), 54 underwent SG and 23 had SJ. General anesthesia was used in 42 patients (55%). The indications for SG or SJ were stroke in 23 patients, cancer in 19, other central nervous system-related conditions in 16, and other conditions in 19. Among the numerous comorbid conditions, pulmonary disease (N = 44) and cardiac disease (N = 32) were most frequent. The median duration of follow-up was 181 days. Complications occurred in 31 of 54 patients (57%) with SG and in 13 of 23 (57%) with SJ. Of the 117 complications, 15% were considered major. Twenty patients (26%) resumed eating. Survival at 1, 6, and 12 months was 79%, 49% and 36%, respectively. Most deaths were due to the disease for which the feeding tube had been placed. In a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, only age and hypoxemia were found to be significantly associated with survival. Hypoxemia, type of tube, central nervous system disease as indication for procedure, and previous aspiration were associated with failure to resume eating (P < 0.05). Survival was similar to that for our patients with PEG during the same period. The overall incidence of feeding tube placement increased throughout the study period.
CONCLUSION: Patients who require enteral feeding tubes have multiple comorbid conditions that have a major influence on the outcome. The overall incidence of feeding tube placement increased after the introduction of PEG. In patients who require long-term enteral nutrition and are unable to have a feeding tube placed percutaneously, surgically placed feeding tubes have outcomes similar to those reported for patients with PEG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7643635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  8 in total

1.  The author replies

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Ljungdahl; M Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Percutaneous jejunostomy.

Authors:  Hans van Overhagen; Jaap Schipper
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Radiology guided antegrade GASTROSTOMY deployment of mushroom (pull type) catheters with classical and modified methods in patients with oropharyngeal, laryngeal carcinoma, and anesthesia risk.

Authors:  Süleyman Bakdık; Muharrem Keskin; Fatih Öncü; Osman Koç
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Postoperative jejunal feeding and outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hani Baradi; R Matthew Walsh; J Michael Henderson; David Vogt; Marc Popovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Predictive factors for early mortality after percutaneous endoscopic and radiologically-inserted gastrostomy.

Authors:  Faidon-Marios Laskaratos; Martin Walker; Mary Walker; Janitha Gowribalan; Despoina Gkotsi; Victoria Wojciechowska; Ajay Arora; Anthony Jenkins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Surgical feeding gastrostomy: are we overdoing it?

Authors:  S Oyogoa; M Schein; S Gardezi; L Wise
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open approach to gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  Ido Mizrahi; Malika Garg; Celia M Divino; Scott Nguyen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.