Literature DB >> 34478337

Radiology guided antegrade GASTROSTOMY deployment of mushroom (pull type) catheters with classical and modified methods in patients with oropharyngeal, laryngeal carcinoma, and anesthesia risk.

Süleyman Bakdık1, Muharrem Keskin1, Fatih Öncü2, Osman Koç1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of study is to evaluate the results of deployment of Percutaneous Radiological Gastrostomy (PRG), which is a good alternative to Surgical Gastrostomy (SG), with transoral approach in cases where Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is contraindicated, difficult or unsuccessful, in patients with high risk of American Society of Anesthesiologists with four scores. In addition, we aimed to demonstrate the advantages of mushroom pull type catheters over push type gastrostomy catheters.
METHODS: This retrospective study included a total of 40 patients (18 females and 22 males) aged 21-92 years who underwent PRG with the antegrade transoral approach. PRG was performed by retrograde passing through the esophagus or snaring the guidewire from the stomach and taking out of the anterior abdominal wall. Patients' demographic data, indications for PRG, procedural outcomes and complications were screened and recorded.
RESULTS: PRG was performed in 39 of 40 patients included in the study. Technical success rate was 97.5%. Procedure-dependent major complications such as death, aspiration, colon perforation, and deep abscess were not observed. Aspiration occurred in the first patient during the first feeding on the day after the procedure. Major complication rate was 2.5%. The total minor complication rate was 17.5% in 7 patients; parastomal leakage in 2 patients (5%), skin rash and infection in 3 (7.5%) patients, minor bleeding in 2 (5%) patients with oropharynx cancer, minimal bleeding from the gastrostomy catheter 1 week after the procedure in 1 (2.5%) patient. None of the cases had buried buffer. Tube functionality was preserved in all patients without any damage.
CONCLUSION: Mushroom tip (pull type) gastrostomy catheter is a safe treatment method for patients requiring prolonged feeding because of wide diameter, endurance, long staying opening duration, less excessive dilatation and parastomal leakage, and no need for gastropexy. Lower cost and easier access are advantageous for mushroom tip pull type catheters compared to push type gastrostomy catheters in our country. The less invasive PRG is an alternative option in patients who are difficult to administer PEG, are at high anesthesia risk and cannot be sedated. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This article is valuable in terms of its contribution to develop an alternative radiological method for the deployment of gastrostomy tubes in medical difficult patients. This method has shortened the duration of the procedure and increased the success rate in patients with difficulty in transition from the stomach to the esophagus or with difficulty in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Mushroom tip catheters can be placed successfully by radiological methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34478337      PMCID: PMC8553181          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  33 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy-guided pull-through gastrostomy.

Authors:  M B Pitton; S Herber; C Düber
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  CT-Guided Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Retrospective Evaluation in 177 Patients.

Authors:  Akio Tamura; Kenichi Kato; Michiko Suzuki; Miyuki Sone; Ryoichi Tanaka; Tatsuhiko Nakasato; Shigeru Ehara
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  B Wollman; H B D'Agostino; J R Walus-Wigle; D W Easter; A Beale
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Fluoroscopy-guided placement of pull-type mushroom-retained gastrostomy tubes in 102 patients.

Authors:  G Kahriman; N Ozcan; H Donmez
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.026

5.  Outcomes of surgical, percutaneous endoscopic, and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomies.

Authors:  E P Cosentini; T Sautner; M Gnant; F Winkelbauer; B Teleky; R Jakesz
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-10

6.  Gastrostomy insertion: comparing the options--PEG, RIG or PIG?

Authors:  H-U Laasch; L Wilbraham; K Bullen; A Marriott; J A L Lawrance; R J Johnson; S H Lee; R E England; G E Gamble; D F Martin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  PEG with introducer or pull method: a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  Iruru Maetani; Tomoko Tada; Takeo Ukita; Hirokazu Inoue; Yoshihiro Sakai; Masao Yoshikawa
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Percutaneous gastrostomy and percutaneous gastrojejunostomy in children: antegrade approach.

Authors:  R B Towbin; W S Ball; G S Bissett
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy: tube function and malfunction.

Authors:  R F McLoughlin; R G Gibney
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 May-Jun

Review 10.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management.

Authors:  Ata A Rahnemai-Azar; Amir A Rahnemaiazar; Rozhin Naghshizadian; Amparo Kurtz; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  1 in total

1.  How often should percutaneous gastrostomy feeding tubes be replaced? A single-institute retrospective study.

Authors:  Byung Hyo Cha; Min Jung Park; Joo Yeong Baeg; Sunpyo Lee; Eui Yong Jeon; Wafaa Salem Obaid Alsalami; Osama Mohamed Ibrahim Idris; Young Joon Ahn
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.