Literature DB >> 7642821

Reliability of pure-tone thresholds at high frequencies.

B Zhou1, D M Green.   

Abstract

Standing waves, in the ear canal are created by the interference of two plane waves of the same frequency traveling in opposite directions. One manifestation of this phenomena is that any lateral motion of the transducer produces a change in the length of the canal and therefore, in general, a change in the sound level at the eardrum. Because of the smaller wavelength at the higher frequencies, the changes produced by movement of the transducer will be larger for the higher frequencies than for the lower frequencies. Thus, when the transducer is removed and replaced between successive threshold estimates, it is expected, from physical principles alone, that the intrasubject reliability of the estimates should be better at the lower frequencies. Previous studies, however, have shown that the intrasubject reliability of threshold estimates is nearly the same at both the low (0-8 kHz) and the high (8-16 kHz) frequency regions. A possible explanation for these anomalous results is proposed. While it is found that transducer placement increases the variability of threshold estimates more at the higher frequencies, it has also been found that conventional headphones reduce the size of the standing wave ratios compared with a hard wall termination. An additional factor is the steeper slope of the psychometric function at the higher frequencies. The combination of these factors produces a standard deviation for threshold estimates that is only about 1 dB larger at the high than at the low frequency region.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7642821     DOI: 10.1121/1.413509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Informational masking of negative masking.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparing the Accuracy and Speed of Manual and Tracking Methods of Measuring Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Theresa J Kunnel; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Extended high-frequency audiometry in healthy adults with different age groups.

Authors:  Mingming Wang; Yu Ai; Yuechen Han; Zhaomin Fan; Peng Shi; Haibo Wang
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-08-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.