Literature DB >> 7642414

Which is the most suitable number of photon beam portals in coplanar radiation therapy?

S Söderström1, A Brahme.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Computer-controlled milling machines for compensator manufacture, dynamic multileaf collimators, and narrow scanned electron or bremsstrahlung photon beams have opened up new possibilities to shape nonuniform fluence profiles and have thus, paved the road for truly three dimensional (3D) dose delivery. The present paper investigates the number of beam portals required to optimize coplanar radiation therapy using uniform and nonuniform dose delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A recently developed algorithm has been used for optimization of the dose delivery in such a way that the probability of achieving tumor control without causing severe reactions in healthy normal tissues becomes as high as possible. This method has been used to optimize the delivered dose distribution for an increasing number of beam portals to determine how many coplanar beam portals are desirable to safely achieve a good treatment outcome. Target volumes in the head and neck, thorax, and abdomen have been investigated.
RESULTS: Nonuniform dose delivery allows a considerable improvement in the treatment outcome compared to uniform dose delivery. This is evident both from the probability of achieving complication-free tumor control and the value of relevant properties of the dose distribution, such as the mean value and the standard deviation of the mean dose to target volume and organs at risk. The results also show a close relationship between the dose distribution parameters and the probability of achieving complication-free tumor control. The level of complication-free tumor control first increases rapidly when the number of beam portals is increased, but already reaches a level of saturation after three to five beam portals. When the saturation level has been reached, the standard deviation of the mean dose to the target volume is around 3%.
CONCLUSIONS: To achieve optimal expectation value of the treatment outcome, within an accuracy of a few percent as measured by the probability of achieving complication-free tumor control, it is generally sufficient to use three nonuniform beam portals. A very large number of coplanar beams may only raise the probability of achieving complication-free tumor control by 1 to 2%. However, good treatment outcome with three beam portals requires that the directions of incidence of the coplanar nonuniform beams are optimally selected. If, on the other hand, the treatment is performed using uniform beams, it is not possible, even with an infinite number of fields, to obtain as high a level of complication-free tumor control as with a few nonuniform beams. From an optimization point of view, it is sufficient to reach a relative standard deviation of the mean dose to the target volume of around 3%. Improved dose homogeneity beyond this level will, in general, not significantly improve the complication-free tumor control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7642414     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00113-D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

1.  [Inverse radiotherapy planning].

Authors:  W Schlegel; P Kneschaurek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Analysis of dose-volume parameters predicting radiation pneumonitis in patients with esophageal cancer treated with 3D-conformal radiation therapy or IMRT.

Authors:  Gaurav Kumar; Sheh Rawat; Abhishek Puri; Manoj Kumar Sharma; Pranav Chadha; Anand Giri Babu; Girigesh Yadav
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy with field rotation--a time-varying fractionation study.

Authors:  Delal Dink; Mark P Langer; Ronald L Rardin; Joseph F Pekny; Gintaras V Reklaitis; Behlul Saka
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2012-01-10

4.  Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma esophagus: is surgical resection required?

Authors:  Sheh Rawat; Gaurav Kumar; Anjali Kakria; Manoj Kumar Sharma; Deepika Chauhan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-09

5.  Optimization of beam angles for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning using genetic algorithm on a distributed computing platform.

Authors:  Daryl P Nazareth; Stephen Brunner; Matthew D Jones; Harish K Malhotra; Mohammad Bakhtiari
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-07

6.  Radiobiological evaluation of forward and inverse IMRT using different fractionations for head and neck tumours.

Authors:  Brigida C Ferreira; Maria do Carmo Lopes; Josefina Mateus; Miguel Capela; Panayiotis Mavroidis
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of upper esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Hua Fu; Lu-Hua Wang; Zong-Mei Zhou; Jian-Rong Dai; Yi-Min Hu; Lu-Jun Zhao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Impact of different beam directions on intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose delivered to functioning lung tissue identified using single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Qin Tian; Fucheng Zhang; Yanming Wang; Weiqiang Qu
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2014-11-12

9.  Verification of inverse planning and treatment delivery for segmental IMRT.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Peter J Childs; Alan P Warrington
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Determination of optimal number of beams in direct machine parameter optimization-based intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cases.

Authors:  Vaitheeswaran Ranganathan; K J Maria Das
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.