Literature DB >> 7640856

Toxicity testing of wound dressing materials in vitro.

R Dover1, W R Otto, J Nanchahal, D J Riches.   

Abstract

There is a bewildering array of dressing materials available for wound coverage. The choice of dressing is often by local custom or practical experience. We wished to investigate if different dressings varied in their ability to either stimulate or inhibit proliferative activity and differentiation in an in vitro test system. We have used a number of test systems for this study. Human dermal fibroblast and keratinocyte cultures were used to screen for proliferative and cytotoxic effects. A more complex "organotypic" method involving fibroblast-impregnated collagen gels overlaid with epidermal keratinocytes was used to investigate effects on differentiation. Dressings were selected from each of the major types available, from simple gauze to hydrocolloids. Of the dressings tested, some reduced cell growth rates but the majority showed no major effect on proliferation or differentiation. Of those displaying an effect, only one could be attributed to cytotoxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7640856     DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(95)90007-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  3 in total

Review 1.  Interactive wound dressings. A practical guide to their use in older patients.

Authors:  C Hansson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  In vitro cellular viability studies on a concentrated surfactant-based wound dressing.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Anne-Marie Salisbury; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Highly porous drug-eluting structures: from wound dressings to stents and scaffolds for tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Jonathan J Elsner; Amir Kraitzer; Orly Grinberg; Meital Zilberman
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.