Literature DB >> 7640546

Development of review criteria: linking guidelines and assessment of quality.

R Baker1, R C Fraser.   

Abstract

Review criteria are designed to enable clinicians and others to assess care. However, there is no established method for developing criteria, and they are often confused with guidelines. Criteria should comprise measurable activities that are appropriate for the setting in which they are to be used. They should also be based on research evidence and prioritised according to the strength of that evidence and effect on outcome. Good criteria can be used to aid implementation of guidelines by providing a standard against which to monitor performance and enabling clinical audit.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7640546      PMCID: PMC2550434          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  19 in total

1.  Problems with implementing guidelines: a randomised controlled trial of consensus management of dyspepsia.

Authors:  R H Jones; S Lydeard; J Dunleavey
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-12

Review 2.  Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-03

Review 3.  Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. I: Developing scientifically valid guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; I Russell
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-12

4.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; I T Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Checklists for review articles.

Authors:  A D Oxman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-10

6.  A method of developing and weighting explicit process of care criteria for quality assessment.

Authors:  C M Ashton; D H Kuykendall; M L Johnson; C C Wun; N P Wray; M J Carr; C H Slater; L Wu; G R Bush
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Implementing findings of research.

Authors:  A Haines; R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-04

Review 8.  Some observations on attempts to measure appropriateness of care.

Authors:  N R Hicks
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-17

9.  National asthma attack audit 1991-2. General Practitioners in Asthma Group.

Authors:  R G Neville; R C Clark; G Hoskins; B Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-02-27

10.  Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  D A Davis; M A Thomson; A D Oxman; R B Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-09-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  18 in total

1.  Clinical governance for diabetes in primary care: use of practice guidelines and participation in multi-practice audit.

Authors:  K Khunti; R Baker; S Ganguli
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  New Zealand and United Kingdom experiences with the RAND modified Delphi approach to producing angina and heart failure criteria for quality assessment in general practice.

Authors:  S A Buetow; G D Coster
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-12

3.  Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice.

Authors:  Jako S Burgers; Richard P T M Grol; Joost O M Zaat; Teun H Spies; Akke K van der Bij; Henk G A Mokkink
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: coronary heart disease as a model.

Authors:  Allen Hutchinson; Aileen McIntosh; Jeff Anderson; Claire Gilbert; Rosemary Field
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Effective audit in general practice: a method for systematically developing audit protocols containing evidence-based review criteria.

Authors:  R C Fraser; K Khunti; R Baker; M Lakhani
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Structured management in primary care of patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  P White
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Clinical audit, a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology.

Authors:  Pasquale Esposito; Antonio Dal Canton
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-06

Review 8.  Bacterial Contribution in Chronicity of Wounds.

Authors:  Kashif Rahim; Shamim Saleha; Xudong Zhu; Liang Huo; Abdul Basit; Octavio Luiz Franco
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M Hann; J Hacker; A Durie; A Thapar; M O Roland
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

Review 10.  Reporting standards for guideline-based performance measures.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Tim Stokes; Beth Shaw; Patrice Lindsay; Raija Sipilä; Markus Follmann; Ina Kopp
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.