Literature DB >> 7640439

Characterization of three formulations of a synthetic foam as models for a range of human cancellous bone types.

J A Szivek1, J D Thompson, J B Benjamin.   

Abstract

Porous polyurethane foams were prepared from Daro foam components with a range of mechanical properties to simulate human trabecular bone. Ratios of 10.0:5.0, 10.0:7.9, and 10.0:10.0 isocyanate to resin were mixed, cured, and cut into cubes. Properties were determined from uniaxial compression to 50% of the original cube height at a strain rate of 1.2 mm/s. Electron microscopy was used to characterize the foam structure. Average compressive yield stress values, ultimate compressive stresses, and elastic moduli ranged from 4.44 to 2.79, 5.61 to 3.28, and 134.0 to 110.1 MPa, respectively, for the three formulations. The foam materials showed a similar morphology of spherical bubbles, and the average bubble size tended to decrease as the ratio of isocyanate to resin increased even though the bubble size differences were not statistically significant. The results indicate that large blocks of foam can be prepared with consistent mechanical properties simulating a range of trabecular bone properties so that implants can be tested for various patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7640439     DOI: 10.1002/jab.770060207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1045-4861


  13 in total

1.  High density polyetherurethane foam as a fragmentation and radiographic surrogate for cortical bone.

Authors:  C L Beardsley; A D Heiner; E A Brandser; J L Marsh; T D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2000

2.  Fatigue characterization of a polymer foam to use as a cancellous bone analog material in the assessment of orthopaedic devices.

Authors:  V Palissery; M Taylor; M Browne
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Characterization of commercial rigid polyurethane foams used as bone analogs for implant testing.

Authors:  Kayla L Calvert; Kevin P Trumble; Thomas J Webster; Lynn A Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Sensate scaffolds can reliably detect joint loading.

Authors:  C L Bliss; J A Szivek; B C Tellis; D S Margolis; A B Schnepp; J T Ruth
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Can high-friction intraannular material increase screw pullout strength in osteoporotic bone?

Authors:  Daniel Bronsnick; Ryan E Harold; Ari Youderian; Giovanni Solitro; Farid Amirouche; Benjamin Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Sensate scaffolds coupled to telemetry can monitor in vivo loading from within a joint over extended periods of time.

Authors:  Chris P Geffre; Cody L Bliss; John A Szivek; Donald W Deyoung; John T Ruth; David S Margolis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Characterisation of a metallic foam-cement composite under selected loading conditions.

Authors:  Gianluca Tozzi; Qing-Hang Zhang; Colin Lupton; Jie Tong; Teodolito Guillen; Arne Ohrndorf; Hans-Jurgen Christ
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Pullout of a lumbar plate with varying screw lengths.

Authors:  Daniel Kyle Palmer; David Rios; Wyzscx Merfil Patacxil; Paul A Williams; Wayne K Cheng; Serkan İnceoğlu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

9.  Optimal interference of the tibial component of the cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.

Authors:  S Campi; S J Mellon; D Ridley; B Foulke; C A F Dodd; H G Pandit; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Compressive properties of commercially available polyurethane foams as mechanical models for osteoporotic human cancellous bone.

Authors:  Purvi S D Patel; Duncan E T Shepherd; David W L Hukins
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.