Literature DB >> 7635115

Ethical considerations, confidentiality issues, rights of human subjects, and uses of monitoring data in research and regulation.

P A Schulte1, M H Sweeney.   

Abstract

Biomarkers are potentially powerful tools for use in research and regulation. Their derivation from biologic specimens collected from human subjects does, however, present many ethical implications. Ethical issues are relevant in almost each facet of human biomarker research studies: design, identification and recruitment of subjects, handling and use of the data, and interpretation and communication of results. Researchers also face a number of dilemmas when considering the use of human biologic specimens and new biomarkers. The mere fact that such markers are the result of measurements in human specimens gives the appearance of being more accurate than traditional sources of information such as questionnaires or environmental monitoring; yet, this may not always be the case. The meaning of the results of biomarker studies may be unclear because the purpose of the study is usually for research rather than clinical purposes. There generally are no established normal ranges for biomarkers and the interpretation of findings are often difficult. Researchers may not communicate these results to subjects or consider followup action because the task may be too difficult or undefined, or the reaction of the subject cannot be anticipated. A wide range of practices in this regard exists among researchers. Many questions remain unanswered about the use of biologic specimens. These include questions of ownership and access to specimens. Related to this is the question of whether specimens collected for one research purpose can be used for an entirely different research purpose. This is still an open question.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7635115      PMCID: PMC1519015          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.95103s369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  11 in total

1.  On being an authentic scientist.

Authors:  Martin L Smith
Journal:  IRB       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

2.  Validation of intermediate end points in cancer research.

Authors:  A Schatzkin; L S Freedman; M H Schiffman; S M Dawsey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Biologic markers in hospital workers exposed to low levels of ethylene oxide.

Authors:  P A Schulte; M Boeniger; J T Walker; S E Schober; M A Pereira; D K Gulati; J P Wojciechowski; A Garza; R Froelich; G Strauss
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  The allure of genetic explanations.

Authors:  J S Alper; M R Natowicz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-19

Review 5.  Molecular epidemiology and the genetics of environmental cancer.

Authors:  P G Shields; C C Harris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-08-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Ethical issues in testing for differential sensitivity to occupational hazards.

Authors:  M Lappé
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1983-11

Review 7.  Predictive identification of hypersusceptible individuals.

Authors:  G S Omenn
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1982-05

8.  A multivariate analysis of the risk of coronary heart disease in Framingham.

Authors:  J Truett; J Cornfield; W Kannel
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1967-07

9.  The potential usefulness of biological markers in risk assessment.

Authors:  F Perera
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Biomarkers in epidemiology: scientific issues and ethical implications.

Authors:  P A Schulte
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

1.  Recommendations for biomonitoring of emergency responders: focus on occupational health investigations and occupational health research.

Authors:  John A Decker; D Gayle DeBord; Bruce Bernard; G Scott Dotson; John Halpin; Cynthia J Hines; Max Kiefer; Kyle Myers; Elena Page; Paul Schulte; John Snawder
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Closing the research loop: a risk-based approach for communicating results of air pollution exposure studies.

Authors:  Devon C Payne-Sturges; Margo Schwab; Timothy J Buckley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Factors Associated with Uptake of HIV Test Results in a Nationally Representative Population-Based AIDS Indicator Survey.

Authors:  Mary Mwangi; Timothy A Kellogg; Sufia S Dadabhai; Rebecca Bunnell; Godfrey Baltazar; Carol Ngare; George K'opiyo; Margaret Mburu; Andrea A Kim
Journal:  Open AIDS J       Date:  2014-03-07

Review 4.  Ethical Considerations in Sexual Health Research: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Maryam Shirmohammadi; Shahnaz Kohan; Ehsan Shamsi-Gooshki; Mohsen Shahriari
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2018 May-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.