Literature DB >> 23356122

Recommendations for biomonitoring of emergency responders: focus on occupational health investigations and occupational health research.

John A Decker1, D Gayle DeBord, Bruce Bernard, G Scott Dotson, John Halpin, Cynthia J Hines, Max Kiefer, Kyle Myers, Elena Page, Paul Schulte, John Snawder.   

Abstract

The disaster environment frequently presents rapidly evolving and unpredictable hazardous exposures to emergency responders. Improved estimates of exposure and effect from biomonitoring can be used to assess exposure-response relationships, potential health consequences, and effectiveness of control measures. Disaster settings, however, pose significant challenges for biomonitoring. A decision process for determining when to conduct biomonitoring during and following disasters was developed. Separate but overlapping decision processes were developed for biomonitoring performed as part of occupational health investigations that directly benefit emergency responders in the short term and for biomonitoring intended to support research studies. Two categories of factors critical to the decision process for biomonitoring were identified: Is biomonitoring appropriate for the intended purpose and is biomonitoring feasible under the circumstances of the emergency response? Factors within these categories include information needs, relevance, interpretability, ethics, methodology, and logistics. Biomonitoring of emergency responders can be a valuable tool for exposure and risk assessment. Information needs, relevance, and interpretability will largely determine if biomonitoring is appropriate; logistical factors will largely determine if biomonitoring is feasible. The decision process should be formalized and may benefit from advance planning.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23356122      PMCID: PMC4501486          DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-12-00173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  15 in total

Review 1.  The role of metabolism and specific metabolites in benzene-induced toxicity: evidence and issues.

Authors:  D Ross
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2000-11

Review 2.  When the facts are just not enough: credibly communicating about risk is riskier when emotions run high and time is short.

Authors:  Barbara J Reynolds
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model.

Authors:  Barbara Reynolds; Matthew W Seeger
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

4.  Guidelines for the communication of Biomonitoring Equivalents: report from the Biomonitoring Equivalents Expert Workshop.

Authors:  Judy S LaKind; Lesa L Aylward; Conrad Brunk; Stephen DiZio; Michael Dourson; Daniel A Goldstein; Michael E Kilpatrick; Daniel Krewski; Michael J Bartels; Hugh A Barton; Peter J Boogaard; John Lipscomb; Kannan Krishnan; Monica Nordberg; Miles Okino; Yu-Mei Tan; Claude Viau; Janice W Yager; Sean M Hays
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Protecting workers in large-scale emergency responses: NIOSH Experience in the Deepwater Horizon response.

Authors:  Margaret M Kitt; John A Decker; Lisa Delaney; Renee Funk; John Halpin; Allison Tepper; James Spahr; John Howard
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  The Kuwait Oil Fire Health Risk Assessment Biological Surveillance Initiative.

Authors:  David P Deeter
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 7.  Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective.

Authors:  S M Hays; R A Becker; H W Leung; L L Aylward; D W Pyatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Determination of serum IgG antibodies to Bacillus anthracis protective antigen in environmental sampling workers using a fluorescent covalent microsphere immunoassay.

Authors:  R E Biagini; D L Sammons; J P Smith; E H Page; J E Snawder; C A F Striley; B A MacKenzie
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Biological markers in environmental health research. Committee on Biological Markers of the National Research Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Ethical considerations, confidentiality issues, rights of human subjects, and uses of monitoring data in research and regulation.

Authors:  P A Schulte; M H Sweeney
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biomonitoring as an Underused Exposure Assessment Tool in Occupational Safety and Health Context-Challenges and Way Forward.

Authors:  Susana Viegas; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Nancy B Hopf; Jos Bessems; Nicole Palmen; Karen S Galea; Kate Jones; Peter Kujath; Radu-Corneliu Duca; Hans Verhagen; Tiina Santonen; Robert Pasanen-Kase
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.