Literature DB >> 7635107

Estimating exposure and dose to characterize health risks: the role of human tissue monitoring in exposure assessment.

K Sexton1, M A Callahan, E F Bryan.   

Abstract

Exposure assessment is an integral part of health risk characterization. Exposure assessments typically address three critical aspects of exposure: the number of people exposed to the environmental toxicant, at specific concentrations, for the time period of interest; the resulting dose; and the relative contribution of important sources and pathways to exposure/dose. Because historically both "point-of-contact" measurements and information about dose and related pharmacokinetic processes have been lacking, exposure assessments have had to rely on construction of "scenarios" to estimate exposure and dose. This could change, however, as advances in development of biologic markers of exposure and dose make it possible to measure and interpret toxicant concentrations in accessible human tissues. The increasing availability of "biomarkers," coupled with improvements in pharmacokinetic understanding, present opportunities to estimate ("reconstruct") exposure from measurements of dose and knowledge of intake and uptake parameters. Human tissue monitoring, however, is not a substitute for more traditional methods of measuring exposure, but rather a complementary approach. A combination of exposure measurements and dose measurements provides the most credible scientific basis for exposure assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7635107      PMCID: PMC1519013          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.95103s313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  19 in total

1.  Human exposure assessment. I: Understanding the uncertainties.

Authors:  G K Whitmyre; J H Driver; M E Ginevan; R G Tardiff; S R Baker
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.273

2.  Use of exposure databases for status and trends analysis.

Authors:  L R Goldman; M Gomez; S Greenfield; L Hall; B S Hulka; W E Kaye; J A Lybarger; D H McKenzie; R S Murphy; D G Wellington
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

3.  Role of exposure databases in risk management.

Authors:  T Burke; H Anderson; N Beach; S Colome; R T Drew; M Firestone; F S Hauchman; T O Miller; D K Wagener; L Zeise
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

4.  Role of exposure databases in epidemiology.

Authors:  G Matanoski; S G Selevan; G Akland; R L Bornschein; D Dockery; L Edmonds; A Greife; M Mehlman; G M Shaw; E Elliott
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

5.  Role of exposure databases in risk assessment.

Authors:  J Graham; K D Walker; M Berry; E F Bryan; M A Callahan; A Fan; B Finley; J Lynch; T McKone; H Ozkaynak
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  A conceptual framework for the validation and use of biologic markers.

Authors:  P A Schulte
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  The promise of molecular epidemiology for quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  D B Hattis
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 8.  "Environmental justice": the central role of research in establishing a credible scientific foundation for informed decision making.

Authors:  K Sexton; K Olden; B L Johnson
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  A decade of studies of human exposure: what have we learned?

Authors:  L Wallace
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  EPA priorities for biologic markers research in environmental health.

Authors:  J R Fowle; K Sexton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  16 in total

1.  Tracking toxins. Biomonitoring outshines the indirect assessment of exposure in determining which pollulants enter the body, and whether they cause disease or disability.

Authors:  Barbara Scott Murdock
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Hazard screening of chemical releases and environmental equity analysis of populations proximate to toxic release inventory facilities in Oregon.

Authors:  C M Neumann; D L Forman; J E Rothlein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Environmental exposure assessment of pesticides in farmworker homes.

Authors:  Jane A Hoppin; John L Adgate; Monty Eberhart; Marcia Nishioka; P Barry Ryan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Human variability and susceptibility to trichloroethylene.

Authors:  G M Pastino; W Y Yap; M Carroquino
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Dermal exposure assessment to pesticides in farming systems in developing countries: comparison of models.

Authors:  Camilo Lesmes-Fabian; Camilo Lesmes Fabian; Claudia R Binder
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Spatial autocorrelation of cancer incidence in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Ahmadi; Ali Al-Zahrani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Assessing secondhand smoke exposure with reported measures.

Authors:  Erika Avila-Tang; Jessica L Elf; K Michael Cummings; Geoffrey T Fong; Melbourne F Hovell; Jonathan D Klein; Robert McMillen; Jonathan P Winickoff; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Measurement of children's exposure to pesticides: analysis of urinary metabolite levels in a probability-based sample.

Authors:  J L Adgate; D B Barr; C A Clayton; L E Eberly; N C Freeman; P J Lioy; L L Needham; E D Pellizzari; J J Quackenboss; A Roy; K Sexton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Biologic monitoring of exposure to environmental chemicals throughout the life stages: requirements and issues for consideration for the National Children's Study.

Authors:  Dana B Barr; Richard Y Wang; Larry L Needham
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Assessing cumulative health risks from exposure to environmental mixtures - three fundamental questions.

Authors:  Ken Sexton; Dale Hattis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.