Literature DB >> 2647488

A conceptual framework for the validation and use of biologic markers.

P A Schulte1.   

Abstract

Biologic markers have been discussed extensively in the scientific literature in the past 5 years. That literature generally has focused on the promise and limitations of markers. Currently, a great amount of effort is under way in government, academia, and the private sector to move the field forward. This effort may be characterized by the inventory and review of potential markers and their use. The next requirement is to add a consideration of research and design strategies for the validation and use of biologic markers, especially as they pertain to the assessment of xenobiotic exposures and resultant health impairments. This paper delineates a conceptual framework for the validation and use of biologic markers. It expands on the concept of a continuum of events between ambient exposure to a xenobiotic substance and resultant clinical disease. Strategies for research and marker validation are presented. Biologic markers are considered useful in etiologic and mechanistic research, in secondary prevention of disease, in risk assessment, and in assessing the effectiveness of environmental controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2647488     DOI: 10.1016/s0013-9351(89)80029-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  19 in total

1.  Role of individual susceptibility in risk assessment of pesticides.

Authors:  G Leng; J Lewalter
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Association of CAT polymorphisms with catalase activity and exposure to environmental oxidative stimuli.

Authors:  Rachel Nadif; Margaret Mintz; Anne Jedlicka; Jean-Pierre Bertrand; Steven R Kleeberger; Francine Kauffmann
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2005-12

3.  An assessment of a urinary biomarker for total human environmental exposure to benzo[a]pyrene.

Authors:  T J Buckley; J M Waldman; R Dhara; A Greenberg; Z Ouyang; P J Lioy
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Candidate gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Francine Kauffmann; Rachel Nadif
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Regulatory landscapes for biomarkers and diagnostic tests: Qualification, approval, and role in clinical practice.

Authors:  William B Mattes; Federico Goodsaid
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-11-07

6.  Blood antioxidant enzymes as markers of exposure or effect in coal miners.

Authors:  R Perrin-Nadif; G Auburtin; M Dusch; J M Porcher; J M Mur
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Effect of TNF and LTA polymorphisms on biological markers of response to oxidative stimuli in coal miners: a model of gene-environment interaction. Tumour necrosis factor and lymphotoxin alpha.

Authors:  R Nadif; A Jedlicka; M Mintz; J-P Bertrand; S Kleeberger; F Kauffmann
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 8.  Personalized exposure assessment: promising approaches for human environmental health research.

Authors:  Brenda K Weis; David Balshaw; John R Barr; David Brown; Mark Ellisman; Paul Lioy; Gilbert Omenn; John D Potter; Martyn T Smith; Lydia Sohn; William A Suk; Susan Sumner; James Swenberg; David R Walt; Simon Watkins; Claudia Thompson; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Biomarkers in epidemiology: scientific issues and ethical implications.

Authors:  P A Schulte
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Biopersistence of respirable synthetic fibers and minerals: the point of view of the epidemiologist.

Authors:  P Boffetta
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.