Literature DB >> 7635048

How do sea urchins invaginate? Using biomechanics to distinguish between mechanisms of primary invagination.

L A Davidson1, M A Koehl, R Keller, G F Oster.   

Abstract

The forces that drive sea urchin primary invagination remain mysterious. To solve this mystery we have developed a set of finite element simulations that test five hypothesized mechanisms. Our models show that each of these mechanisms can generate an invagination; however, the mechanical properties of an epithelial sheet required for proper invagination are different for each mechanism. For example, we find that the gel swelling hypothesis of Lane et al. (Lane, M. C., Koehl, M. A. R., Wilt, F. and Keller, R. (1993) Development 117, 1049-1060) requires the embryo to possess a mechanically stiff apical extracellular matrix and highly deformable cells, whereas a hypothesis based on apical constriction of the epithelial cells requires a more compliant extracellular matrix. For each mechanism, we have mapped out a range of embryo designs that work. Additionally, the simulations predict specific cell shape changes accompanying each mechanism. This allows us to design experiments that can distinguish between different mechanisms, all of which can, in principle, drive primary invagination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7635048     DOI: 10.1242/dev.121.7.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  53 in total

1.  From genes to neural tube defects (NTDs): insights from multiscale computational modeling.

Authors:  G Wayne Brodland; Xiaoguang Chen; Paul Lee; Mungo Marsden
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2010-04-16

2.  Computational modeling of morphogenesis regulated by mechanical feedback.

Authors:  Ashok Ramasubramanian; Larry A Taber
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2007-02-21

3.  Physics and the canalization of morphogenesis: a grand challenge in organismal biology.

Authors:  Michelangelo von Dassow; Lance A Davidson
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Theoretical study of Beloussov's hyper-restoration hypothesis for mechanical regulation of morphogenesis.

Authors:  Larry A Taber
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2007-10-02

5.  Microplate assay for quantifying developmental morphologies: effects of exogenous hyalin on sea urchin gastrulation.

Authors:  Z Razinia; E J Carroll; S B Oppenheimer
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.442

6.  Practical aspects of the cellular force inference toolkit (CellFIT).

Authors:  Jim H Veldhuis; David Mashburn; M Shane Hutson; G Wayne Brodland
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.441

7.  Towards a unified theory for morphomechanics.

Authors:  Larry A Taber
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Quantitative approaches in developmental biology.

Authors:  Andrew C Oates; Nicole Gorfinkiel; Marcos González-Gaitán; Carl-Philipp Heisenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  The interplay between cell signalling and mechanics in developmental processes.

Authors:  Callie Johnson Miller; Lance A Davidson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Combining laser microsurgery and finite element modeling to assess cell-level epithelial mechanics.

Authors:  M Shane Hutson; J Veldhuis; Xiaoyan Ma; Holley E Lynch; P Graham Cranston; G Wayne Brodland
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.