Literature DB >> 7634629

Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study.

J W Pritchett1.   

Abstract

Fifty femoral stems of 5 different types were compared with respect to bone retention in the proximal femur at least 3 years after implantation. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans were used to compare bone mineral density in the medial neck of the replaced hip with that of the other hip where surgery had not been performed. Bone mineral density declined on average of 57% with the cemented straight stem Mueller prosthesis and 34% for the uncemented Anatomic Medullary Locking prosthesis. For the cemented Harris Precoat prosthesis, the decline in bone mineral density was 43%. Two uncemented implants with horizontal platform-type collars showed an average decline in bone mineral density of 8% and 14%. Clinically, all the stems functioned well, and excellent implant insertion technique had been used. The decline in bone mineral density was evident on plain radiographs. The decrease in bone mineral density paralleled the known decrease in the medial neck strain. This study suggests that more proximal bone will be maintained by implants that load the proximal femur in as physiologic a fashion as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7634629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Effect of the initial implant fitting on the predicted secondary stability of a cementless stem.

Authors:  M Viceconti; A Pancanti; M Dotti; F Traina; L Cristofolini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem.

Authors:  Alex Leali; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

4.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Densitometric evaluation of bone-prosthetic counterface in hip and knee arthroplasty with modern implants.

Authors:  Andrea Cozzi Lepri; Marco Giorgini; Carla Signorini; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Maria Luisa Brandi; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

6.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

7.  Hip Replacement or Hip Resurfacing with a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Acetabular Bearing: A Qualitative and Quantitative Preference Study.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-05-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.