Literature DB >> 7634593

The cemented acetabular component of a total hip replacement. All polyethylene versus metal backing.

M A Ritter1.   

Abstract

The increasing use of a cementless acetabular component with a total hip replacement requires the need for metal backing, but metal backing with cement in the author's use has been less than optimal. The intention, therefore, was to evaluate all cemented acetabular components, with and without metal backing, used by the author, to offer a standard by which other acetabular components can be compared. From 1969 to 1983, 238 Charnley, 141 Mueller, 555 T-28, 100 Miami Orthopaedic Surgical Clinic total hip replacements with cemented all-polyethylene acetabula, and 134 Miami Orthopaedic Surgical Clinic total hip replacements with a cemented metal-backed acetabula were performed and followed from 1 to 22 years. The cemented acetabular component failure rates for the Charnley, T-28, and all-polyethylene Miami Orthopaedic Surgical Clinic were 14%, 10%, and 9%, respectively. There was a 20% failure rate in the Mueller and metal-backed Miami Orthopaedic Surgical Clinic acetabular components. The Charnley (p < 0.0001), T-28 (p < 0.0001), all-polyethylene Miami Orthopaedic Surgical Clinic (p < 0.0001), and Mueller (p < 0.012) total hip replacements demonstrated statistically improved survival rates as compared with the metal-backed Miami Orthopaedic Surgical Clinic acetabular components. The Charnley (p < 0.0001) and T-28 (p < 0.0003) sockets survived statistically better than the Mueller sockets.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7634593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

1.  An economic model to estimate the relative costs over 20 years of different hip prostheses.

Authors:  K Baxter; G Bevan
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; David J Biau; Denis Huten; Thierry Musset; François Gaucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Metal-on-metal: history, state of the art (2010).

Authors:  Philippe Triclot
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Peter Cnudde; Ola Rolfson; Alexander Wall; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions.

Authors:  Frantz L Langlais; Mickaël Ropars; François Gaucher; Thierry Musset; Olivier Chaix
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Revision and complication rates in 654 Exeter total hip replacements, with a maximum follow-up of 20 years.

Authors:  Jonas Franklin; Otto Robertsson; Julius Gestsson; L Stefan Lohmander; Thorvaldur Ingvarsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.