Literature DB >> 7633582

Measuring hallux valgus: a comparison of conventional radiography and clinical parameters with regard to measurement accuracy.

S Resch1, L Ryd, A Stenström, K Johnsson, K Reynisson.   

Abstract

To assess the repeatability and error of conventional x-ray measurements, intra- and interobserver evaluations of measurement accuracy were done on 20 preoperative and 40 postoperative (20 chevron and 20 proximal osteotomy) x-rays of hallux valgus patients. Standard x-rays showed an average interobserver error of measurement of 6.4 degrees for the hallux valgus angle, 5.4 degrees for the intermetatarsal angle, and 2.0 mm for the intermetatarsal distance. The intraobserver error did not differ greatly. The repeatability and error of two clinical measurements, ball circumference, and dorsal to plantar range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint were evaluated for 20 healthy volunteers. The ball circumference had an average measurement error of 1.1 cm, whereas the dorsal and plantar range of motion of the great toe had an average measurement error of 12 degrees in dorsiflexion and 16 degrees in plantarflexion. In both clinical and radiographic parameters, linear measurements were more accurate than angular measurements. Although x-rays are of value in hallux valgus surgery, standard x-rays are less accurate than previously assumed. Small changes produced by osteotomies may be hidden by the postoperative measurement error. The results of hallux valgus surgery should primarily be evaluated clinically. When clinical and radiological evaluations are made, linear measurements may be preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7633582     DOI: 10.1177/107110079501600504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  Diaphyseal nutrient foramina in the first metatarsals in normal and hallux valgus feet: location and surgical implications.

Authors:  D Monreal-Redondo; F J Fernández-Camacho
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-05-16       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Use of the iPhone for radiographic evaluation of hallux valgus.

Authors:  Tolga Ege; Ozkan Kose; Kenan Koca; Bahtiyar Demiralp; Mustafa Basbozkurt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The Linear Hallux Valgus Offset- A novel way to measure Hallux Valgus.

Authors:  A Saad; Karthikeyan P Iyengar; John Fitzpatrick; C Azzopardi; H Panchal; R Botchu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  The hallux valgus angle of the margo medialis pedis as an alternative to the measurement of the metatarsophalangeal hallux valgus angle.

Authors:  Christian Klein; Wieland Kinz; Alexander Zembsch; Elisabeth Groll-Knapp; Michael Kundi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Correlation between Manchester Grading Scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score in Patients with Hallux Valgus.

Authors:  Kalliopi Iliou; George Paraskevas; Panagiotis Kanavaros; Alexandra Barbouti; Aristidis Vrettakos; Christos Gekas; Panagiotis Kitsoulis
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 1.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.