OBJECTIVE: To examine if the reduced number of items in the modified version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) concerning difficulty of performing activities of daily living may lead to a reduced ability to detect clinical changes compared with the original HAQ. METHODS: In 56 consecutive ambulatory patients with rheumatoid arthritis, we examined the mean change in clinical and laboratory parameters for those who recorded improved, unchanged, or worse MHAQ scores one year after a baseline assessment. RESULTS: At baseline, about 50% of the patients had an MHAQ score < 0.3 and clustered at the normal end of the scale. Because of a ceiling effect, the MHAQ failed to detect clinical improvement in 18% of the patients. Changes in clinical and laboratory parameters were associated with improved, unchanged, or worse scores with the HAQ but not the MHAQ. CONCLUSION: Although the format of the MHAQ has the advantage of eliciting a 'satisfaction' score, limitations in its sensitivity to detect clinical improvement in patients with relatively little difficulty in activities of daily living may not justify the use of this particular version of shorter questionnaire in certain clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE: To examine if the reduced number of items in the modified version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) concerning difficulty of performing activities of daily living may lead to a reduced ability to detect clinical changes compared with the original HAQ. METHODS: In 56 consecutive ambulatory patients with rheumatoid arthritis, we examined the mean change in clinical and laboratory parameters for those who recorded improved, unchanged, or worse MHAQ scores one year after a baseline assessment. RESULTS: At baseline, about 50% of the patients had an MHAQ score < 0.3 and clustered at the normal end of the scale. Because of a ceiling effect, the MHAQ failed to detect clinical improvement in 18% of the patients. Changes in clinical and laboratory parameters were associated with improved, unchanged, or worse scores with the HAQ but not the MHAQ. CONCLUSION: Although the format of the MHAQ has the advantage of eliciting a 'satisfaction' score, limitations in its sensitivity to detect clinical improvement in patients with relatively little difficulty in activities of daily living may not justify the use of this particular version of shorter questionnaire in certain clinical settings.
Authors: A M Jette; A R Davies; P D Cleary; D R Calkins; L V Rubenstein; A Fink; J Kosecoff; R T Young; R H Brook; T L Delbanco Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1986 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1988-03
Authors: Roxanne E Jensen; Arnold L Potosky; Bryce B Reeve; Elizabeth Hahn; David Cella; James Fries; Ashley Wilder Smith; Theresa H M Keegan; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lisa Paddock; Carol M Moinpour Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-05-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maura D Iversen; Michelle Frits; Johan von Heideken; Jing Cui; Michael Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Marie Martin; Mark Kosinski; Jakob B Bjorner; John E Ware; Ross Maclean; Tracy Li Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2007-03-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Martijn Ah Oude Voshaar; Peter M Ten Klooster; Erik Taal; Eswar Krishnan; Mart Afj van de Laar Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 5.156