Literature DB >> 7631857

Effect of exercise on coronary pressure-flow relationship in hypertrophied left ventricle.

D J Duncker1, J Zhang, T J Pavek, M J Crampton, R J Bache.   

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) secondary to chronic pressure overload is associated with increased susceptibility to myocardial hypoperfusion and ischemia during exercise. The present study was performed to determine whether exercise causes alterations in minimum coronary resistance or effective back pressure [coronary pressure at zero flow (Pzf)] that limit maximum myocardial perfusion in the hypertrophied heart. Ascending aortic banding in 7 dogs increased the LV weight-to-body weight ratio to 7.7 +/- 0.3 g/kg compared with 4.6 +/- 0.2 g/kg in 11 normal dogs (P < 0.01). Maximum coronary vasodilation was produced by intracoronary infusion of adenosine. Under resting conditions, the slope of the pressure-flow relationship (conductance) was significantly lower in the LVH animals than in the normal dogs (7.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 11.9 +/- 0.8 x 10(-2) ml.min-1.g-1.mmHg-1; P < 0.01); the slope correlated with the degree of hypertrophy r = 0.74; P < 0.001). The Pzf measured during total coronary artery occlusion (Pzf,measured) was significantly elevated in LVH compared with normal dogs (25.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 13.0 +/- 1.2 mmHg; P < 0.01); Pzf,measured was positively correlated (r = 0.78, P < 0.0005) with LV end-diastolic pressure measured during total coronary artery occlusion (9.0 +/- 1.1 mmHg in normal dogs and 22.2 +/- 3.2 mmHg in LVH dogs; P < 0.01). Graded treadmill exercise to maximum heart rates of 210 +/- 9 and 201 +/- 8 beats/min in normal and LVH animals, respectively, caused similar decreases in the slope of the pressure-flow relationship in LVH (from 7.7 +/- 0.9 to 6.1 +/- 0.8 x 10(-2) ml.min-1.g-1.mmHg-1; P < 0.01) and normal dogs (from 11.9 +/- 0.8 to 10.0 +/- 0.7 x 10(-2) ml.min-1.g-1.mmHg-1; P < 0.01). However, exercise-induced increases in Pzf,measured were significantly greater in the LVH animals (from 25.6 +/- 2.2 to 40.8 +/- 2.1 mmHg; P < 0.01) than in normal animals (from 13.0 +/- 1.2 to 24 +/- 2.1 mmHg; P < 0.01) (P < 0.01 LVH vs. normal). The greater increase in Pzf paralleled a more pronounced increase in LV end-diastolic pressure in the LVH dogs from 22.2 +/- 3.2 to 39.1 +/- 2.7 mmHg) than in normal dogs from 9.0 +/- 1.1 to 14.2 +/- 2.0 mmHg). The results suggest that exaggerated increases in filling pressure during exercise in the hypertrophied left ventricles contributed to impairment of myocardial perfusion during exercise by augmenting the back pressure, which opposes coronary flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7631857     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1995.269.1.H271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  6 in total

1.  Augmentation of coronary conductance in adult sheep made anaemic during fetal life.

Authors:  L Davis; J B Roullet; K L Thornburg; M Shokry; A R Hohimer; G D Giraud
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Exercise training in adverse cardiac remodeling.

Authors:  Dirk J Duncker; Elza D van Deel; Monique C de Waard; Martine de Boer; Daphne Merkus; Jolanda van der Velden
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 3.  Fractional flow reserve as a surrogate for inducible myocardial ischaemia.

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn Meuwissen; Javier Escaned; Justin E Davies; Maria Siebes; Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Measurement of technetium-99m sestamibi signals in rats administered a mitochondrial uncoupler and in a rat model of heart failure.

Authors:  Akira Kawamoto; Takao Kato; Tetsuo Shioi; Junji Okuda; Tsuneaki Kawashima; Yodo Tamaki; Shinichiro Niizuma; Yohei Tanada; Genzou Takemura; Michiko Narazaki; Tetsuya Matsuda; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: where to after FAME 2?

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Martijn Meuwissen; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2015-12-03

Review 6.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jo M Zelis; Pim A L Tonino; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne; Richard L Kirkeeide; K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.