Literature DB >> 7631727

Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of low-forceps delivery according to the new criteria of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery in term pregnancies.

F Carmona1, S Martínez-Román, D Manau, V Cararach, X Iglesias.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to investigate the maternal and neonatal effects of elective low-forceps delivery, as currently defined by the 1988 criteria of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. STUDY
DESIGN: During a 6-month period we conducted a prospective study that included 50 nulliparous term parturients who were randomly allocated to spontaneous or elective low-forceps delivery. Patients with either maternal or fetal disorders that could affect the outcome were excluded. All deliveries were attended by three experienced obstetricians.
RESULTS: Spontaneous and forceps delivery group were similar regarding maternal or gestational age, fetal scalp pH, antepartum maternal hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, maternal outcome, mean birth weight, and number of neonates with low Apgar scores or cord arterial pH < 7.20. In the spontaneous delivery group the time elapsed since randomization to delivery was significantly longer (18 vs 10.2 minutes, p < 0.001) and the mean cord arterial pH was significantly lower (7.23 vs 7.27, p = 0.01) than in the forceps delivery group.
CONCLUSION: Elective low forceps delivery may be used to shorten the second stage of labor without immediate maternal or neonatal side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7631727     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90169-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

Review 1.  Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.

Authors:  Ganga L Verma; Jessica J Spalding; Marc D Wilkinson; G Justus Hofmeyr; Valerie Vannevel; Fidelma O'Mahony
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-24

2.  Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit; William A Grobman; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; George Saade; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review.

Authors:  Emily J Hotton; Sophie Renwick; Erik Lenguerrand; Julia Wade; Tim J Draycott; Joanna F Crofts; Natalie S Blencowe
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.435

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.