BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A cross-sectional survey is the best method for determining the prevalence of a chronic condition such as stroke. Before embarking on a large population study, a valid screening instrument is necessary. This study aimed to validate a self-completion postal screening questionnaire for assessing lifetime history of stroke. METHODS: A random sample of 2000 people aged 45 years and over was selected from the Family Health Services Authority register. A brief self-completion questionnaire requesting self-reported history of stroke was mailed to each individual. Responders reporting a history of stroke received a request for a standardized home assessment visit. Confirmation of the diagnosis of stroke was made based on information from the home visit together with multiple sources of case ascertainment. False-negative responses and assessment of nonresponse bias were documented. RESULTS: The response rate for the questionnaire was 88%. Of the sample, 120 (6%) who were wrongly registered were excluded; 173 (10%) of the 1663 responders reported a history of stroke. The question "Have you ever had a stroke?" had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: This simple self-completion questionnaire is a valid means of screening for cases of stroke in the community and could form the basis for subsequent studies of prevalence and health needs.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A cross-sectional survey is the best method for determining the prevalence of a chronic condition such as stroke. Before embarking on a large population study, a valid screening instrument is necessary. This study aimed to validate a self-completion postal screening questionnaire for assessing lifetime history of stroke. METHODS: A random sample of 2000 people aged 45 years and over was selected from the Family Health Services Authority register. A brief self-completion questionnaire requesting self-reported history of stroke was mailed to each individual. Responders reporting a history of stroke received a request for a standardized home assessment visit. Confirmation of the diagnosis of stroke was made based on information from the home visit together with multiple sources of case ascertainment. False-negative responses and assessment of nonresponse bias were documented. RESULTS: The response rate for the questionnaire was 88%. Of the sample, 120 (6%) who were wrongly registered were excluded; 173 (10%) of the 1663 responders reported a history of stroke. The question "Have you ever had a stroke?" had a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: This simple self-completion questionnaire is a valid means of screening for cases of stroke in the community and could form the basis for subsequent studies of prevalence and health needs.
Authors: Frederick W Unverzagt; Lin T Guey; Richard N Jones; Michael Marsiske; Jonathan W King; Virginia G Wadley; Michael Crowe; George W Rebok; Sharon L Tennstedt Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: George Howard; Brett M Kissela; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Leslie A McClure; Elsayed Z Soliman; Suzanne E Judd; J David Rhodes; Mary Cushman; Claudia S Moy; Kara A Sands; Virginia J Howard Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Victor W Sung; Natasha Johnson; U Shanette Granstaff; William J Jones; James F Meschia; Linda S Williams; Monika M Safford Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Deborah A Levine; James M Walter; Sudeep J Karve; Lesli E Skolarus; Steven R Levine; Kristine A Mulhorn Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Christiane Reitz; Nicole Schupf; José A Luchsinger; Adam M Brickman; Jennifer J Manly; Howard Andrews; Ming X Tang; Charles DeCarli; Truman R Brown; Richard Mayeux Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2009-05-11