Maria Khan1, Ayeesha Kamran Kamal2, Muhammad Islam3, Iqbal Azam3, Azam Virk4, Alia Nasir4, Hasan Rehman1, Anita Arif1, Muhammad Jan1, Anjum Akhtar1, Minaz Mawani5, Junaid Abdul Razzak6, Omrana Pasha3. 1. Stroke Service, Department of Medicine, The International Cerebrovascular Translational Clinical Research Training Program, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Aga Khan University. 2. Stroke Service, Department of Medicine, The International Cerebrovascular Translational Clinical Research Training Program, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Aga Khan University. Electronic address: ayeesha.kamal@aku.edu. 3. Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University. 4. Aman Health, Aman Foundation. 5. Department of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aga Khan University. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University and AMAN Health, AMAN Foundation Karachi, Pakistan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is a paucity of data from South Asia where stroke is highly prevalent. Validated tools administrable by community health workers (CHWs) are required to identify stroke in the community in a resource-strapped region such as this. METHODS: The study was conducted in a transitional slum in Karachi, Pakistan. Questionnaire to Verify Stroke-Free Status (QVSFS) was adapted and translated into Urdu. Two CHWs, trained by a neurologist, selected 322 community-dwelling subjects using purposive sampling. Each CHW collected data independently, which was validated by a vascular neurologist who directly examined each participant. To assess the effect of audit and feedback, data from the final 10% of the subjects were collected after a second training session for the CHWs. Sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen kappa were determined for the CHW-administered questionnaire against neurovascular assessment. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 56.5 years with 71% of participants being women. The sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire of detecting stroke was 77.1% (confidence interval [CI], 64.1-86.9) and 85.8% (CI, 83.5-87.5), respectively. The chance-corrected agreement using the Cohen kappa statistic was .51 (CI, .38-.60). Kappa ranged from .37 to .58 for each of the 7 stroke symptoms. Hemianesthesia (72.9%) and hemiplegia (64.6%) were the most sensitive symptoms. The performance and agreement improved from moderate to substantial after audit and feedback. CONCLUSIONS: We found a reasonable sensitivity and specificity and moderate agreement between CHW-administered QVSFS and assessment by a vascular neurologist.
BACKGROUND:Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. There is a paucity of data from South Asia where stroke is highly prevalent. Validated tools administrable by community health workers (CHWs) are required to identify stroke in the community in a resource-strapped region such as this. METHODS: The study was conducted in a transitional slum in Karachi, Pakistan. Questionnaire to Verify Stroke-Free Status (QVSFS) was adapted and translated into Urdu. Two CHWs, trained by a neurologist, selected 322 community-dwelling subjects using purposive sampling. Each CHW collected data independently, which was validated by a vascular neurologist who directly examined each participant. To assess the effect of audit and feedback, data from the final 10% of the subjects were collected after a second training session for the CHWs. Sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen kappa were determined for the CHW-administered questionnaire against neurovascular assessment. RESULTS: Mean age of participants was 56.5 years with 71% of participants being women. The sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire of detecting stroke was 77.1% (confidence interval [CI], 64.1-86.9) and 85.8% (CI, 83.5-87.5), respectively. The chance-corrected agreement using the Cohen kappa statistic was .51 (CI, .38-.60). Kappa ranged from .37 to .58 for each of the 7 stroke symptoms. Hemianesthesia (72.9%) and hemiplegia (64.6%) were the most sensitive symptoms. The performance and agreement improved from moderate to substantial after audit and feedback. CONCLUSIONS: We found a reasonable sensitivity and specificity and moderate agreement between CHW-administered QVSFS and assessment by a vascular neurologist.
Authors: P N Karanjia; J J Nelson; D S Lefkowitz; A R Dick; J F Toole; L E Chambless; R Hayes; V J Howard Journal: Neurology Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: T Truelsen; P U Heuschmann; R Bonita; G Arjundas; P Dalal; A Damasceno; D Nagaraja; A Ogunniyi; S Oveisgharan; K Radhakrishnan; V I Skvortsoya; V Stakhovskaya Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: O H Del Brutto; L Idrovo; A Mosquera; E Díaz-Calderón; R Santibáñez; C Navas; F Cuesta Journal: Rev Neurol Date: 2004 Aug 16-31 Impact factor: 0.870
Authors: James F Meschia; Marc A Lojacono; Mary J Miller; Thomas G Brott; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Peter C O'Brien Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2003-12-29 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: G J Jungehülsing; J Müller-Nordhorn; C H Nolte; S Roll; K Rossnagel; A Reich; A Wagner; K M Einhäupl; S N Willich; A Villringer Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 3.282