Literature DB >> 7629807

Prediction of drug binding affinities by comparative binding energy analysis.

A R Ortiz1, M T Pisabarro, F Gago, R C Wade.   

Abstract

A new computational method for deducing quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) using structural data from ligand-macromolecule complexes is presented. First, the ligand-macromolecule interaction energy is computed for a set of ligands using molecular mechanics calculations. Then, by selecting and scaling components of the ligand-macromolecule interaction energy that show good predictive ability, a regression equation is obtained in which activity is correlated with the interaction energies of parts of the ligands and key regions of the macromolecule. Application to the interaction of the human synovial fluid phospholipase A2 with 26 inhibitors indicates that the derived QSAR has good predictive ability and provides insight into the mechanism of enzyme inhibition. The method, which we term comparative binding energy (COMBINE) analysis, is expected to be applicable to ligand-receptor interactions in a range of contexts including rational drug design, host-guest systems, and protein engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7629807     DOI: 10.1021/jm00014a020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  55 in total

1.  Structural modeling extends QSAR analysis of antibody-lysozyme interactions to 3D-QSAR.

Authors:  Eva K Freyhult; Karl Andersson; Mats G Gustafsson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  CoMFA and docking study of novel estrogen receptor subtype selective ligands.

Authors:  Peter Wolohan; David E Reichert
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Development of biologically active compounds by combining 3D QSAR and structure-based design methods.

Authors:  Wolfgang Sippl
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  How optimal are the binding energetics of barnase and barstar?

Authors:  Ting Wang; Sanja Tomic; Razif R Gabdoulline; Rebecca C Wade
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  How to simulate affinities for host-guest systems lacking binding mode information: application to the liquid chromatographic separation of hexabromocyclododecane stereoisomers.

Authors:  Vedat Durmaz; Marcus Weber; Roland Becker
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Fragment-guided approach to incorporating structural information into a CoMFA study: BACE-1 as an example.

Authors:  Lívia Barros Salum; Napoleão Fonseca Valadares
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  A combination of docking, QM/MM methods, and MD simulation for binding affinity estimation of metalloprotein ligands.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Viera Lukacova; Dogan Comez; Daniel M Kroll; Soumyendu Raha; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Development of quantitative structure-binding affinity relationship models based on novel geometrical chemical descriptors of the protein-ligand interfaces.

Authors:  Shuxing Zhang; Alexander Golbraikh; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Processing multimode binding situations in simulation-based prediction of ligand-macromolecule affinities.

Authors:  Akash Khandelwal; Viera Lukacova; Daniel M Kroll; Soumyendu Raha; Dogan Comez; Stefan Balaz
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 10.  Pushing the boundaries of 3D-QSAR.

Authors:  Richard D Cramer; Bernd Wendt
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.