Literature DB >> 7624399

Cumulative operative procedures in patients aged 14 years and older with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate.

S R Cohen1, M Corrigan, J Wilmot, C A Trotman.   

Abstract

Sixty-seven consecutive patients over the age of 14 with either unilateral (n = 38) cleft lip and palate or bilateral (n = 29) cleft lip and palate seen over a 15-month period at the University of Michigan Craniofacial Program were reviewed to determine the total number of surgical procedures performed over the course of treatment. The demographics of the two groups differed: There were 25 males and 13 females who were a mean age of 17 years and 9 months with unilateral cleft lip and palate and 23 males and 6 females who were a mean age of 18 years and 5 months with bilateral cleft lip and palate. Lip and palate repairs were carried out on all patients. Lip adhesions were performed in 29 and 62 percent; pharyngoplasties (either pharyngeal flap or modified Ortichochea) in 39 and 38 percent; alveolar bone grafts in 82 and 79 percent; Abbé flaps in 0 and 10 percent; and orthognathic surgery was done in 10.5 and 13.8 percent and recommended and/or done in 26 and 24 percent of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate, respectively. Lip revisions averaged 1.13 and 2.17 per patient and secondary nasal surgeries averaged 1.13 and 1.18 per patient in the unilateral cleft lip and palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate, respectively. All totaled, the average number of operations was 6.12 per patient (range 3 to 12) in the unilateral cleft lip and palate and 8.04 per patient (range 5 to 15) in the bilateral cleft lip and palate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7624399     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199508000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Effects of lip revision surgery in cleft lip/palate patients.

Authors:  C-A Trotman; J J Faraway; C Phillips; J van Aalst
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Marked Variation Exists Among Surgeons and Hospitals in the Use of Secondary Cleft Lip Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas J Sitzman; Adam C Carle; Jaclyn N Lundberg; Pamela C Heaton; Michael A Helmrath; Carroll-Ann Trotman; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2019-10-09

3.  Efficacy and Safety in Combining Primary Palatoplasty and Myringotomy in Patients with Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Esperanza Mantilla-Rivas; Ishwarya Mamidi; Alex Rokni; Ashleigh Brennan; Md Sohel Rana; Agnes Goldrich; Monica Manrique; Monica Shah; Brian K Reilly; Gary F Rogers; Albert K Oh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-27

4.  Jagged1 is essential for osteoblast development during maxillary ossification.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hill; Masato Yuasa; Jonathan Schoenecker; Steven L Goudy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Oral wound healing models and emerging regenerative therapies.

Authors:  Afra I Toma; Julia M Fuller; Nick J Willett; Steven L Goudy
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 10.171

6.  Continuous Multidisciplinary Care for Patients With Orofacial Clefts-Should the Follow-up Interval Depend on the Cleft Entity?

Authors:  Anna K Sander; Elisabeth Grau; Anita Kloss-Brandstätter; Rüdiger Zimmerer; Michael Neuhaus; Alexander K Bartella; Bernd Lethaus
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2021-08-19

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of sagittal maxillary internal distraction osteogenesis in unilateral cleft lip and palate patient and noncleft patients: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sultan Olmez; Servet Dogan; Mahmut Pekedis; Hasan Yildiz
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.079

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.