Literature DB >> 24552304

Biomechanical evaluation of sagittal maxillary internal distraction osteogenesis in unilateral cleft lip and palate patient and noncleft patients: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Sultan Olmez1, Servet Dogan, Mahmut Pekedis, Hasan Yildiz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pattern and amount of stress and displacement during maxillary sagittal distraction osteogenesis (DO) between a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and a noncleft patient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional finite element models for both skulls were constructed. Displacements of the surface landmarks and stress distributions in the circummaxillary sutures were analyzed after an anterior displacement of 6 mm was loaded to the elements where the inferior plates of the distractor were assumed to be fixed and were below the Le Fort I osteotomy line.
RESULTS: In sagittal plane, more forward movement was found on the noncleft side in the UCLP model (-6.401 mm on cleft side and -6.651 mm on noncleft side for the central incisor region). However, similar amounts of forward movement were seen in the control model. In the vertical plane, a clockwise rotation occurred in the UCLP model, whereas a counterclockwise rotation was seen in the control model. The mathematical UCLP model also showed higher stress values on the sutura nasomaxillaris, frontonasalis, and zygomatiomaxillaris on the cleft side than on the normal side.
CONCLUSIONS: Not only did the sagittal distraction forces produce advancement forces at the intermaxillary sutures, but more stress was also present on the sutura nasomaxillaris, sutura frontonasalis, and sutura zygomaticomaxillaris on the cleft side than on the noncleft side.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distraction osteogenesis; Finite element analysis; Maxillary advancement; UCLP

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24552304      PMCID: PMC8641278          DOI: 10.2319/080613-586.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  22 in total

Review 1.  Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in maxillary advancement: review of the literature.

Authors:  F Costa; M Robiony; M Politi
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1999

2.  A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  L K Cheung; H D P Chua
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Analysis of sutural strain in maxillary protraction therapy.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Luai Mahaini; Ingrid Rudzki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  The assessment of midface distraction osteogenesis in treatment of upper airway obstruction.

Authors:  Haisong Xu; Zheyan Yu; Xiongzheng Mu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Biomechanical effect of anteriorly directed extraoral forces on the craniofacial complex: a study using the finite element method.

Authors:  K Tanne; J Hiraga; K Kakiuchi; Y Yamagata; M Sakuda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Finite element analysis for stresses in the craniofacial sutures produced by maxillary protraction forces applied at the upper canines.

Authors:  J Miyasaka-Hiraga; K Tanne; S Nakamura
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1994-11

7.  The effect of head trauma on fracture healing: biomechanical testing and finite element analysis.

Authors:  Fırat Ozan; Hasan Yıldız; Osman Arslan Bora; Mahmut Pekedis; Gülnihal Ay Coşkun; Oya Göre
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.511

8.  Maxillary distraction: aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip-palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition.

Authors:  F Molina; F Ortiz Monasterio; M de la Paz Aguilar; J Barrera
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Comparative study of different osteotomy modalities in maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Hongbo Yu; Xudong Wang; Bing Fang; Steve Guofang Shen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Biomechanical effects of rapid maxillary expansion on the craniofacial skeleton, studied by the finite element method.

Authors:  H Işeri; A E Tekkaya; O Oztan; S Bilgiç
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mechanical analyses of critical surgical maneuvers in the correction of cleft lip nasal deformity.

Authors:  Hanyao Huang; Yeping Li; Xiangyou Luo; Xu Cheng; Bing Shi; Jingtao Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Accuracy of Virtually Planned Maxillary Distraction in Cleft Patients - An Evaluative Study.

Authors:  Josep Rubio-Palau; Marta Ayats-Soler; Asteria Albert-Cazalla; Irene Martìnez-Padilla; Alejandra Prieto-Gundin; Natalia Prieto-Peronnet; Marìa Piedad Ramìrez-Fernández; Javier Mareque-Bueno
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-02-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.