Literature DB >> 7623865

DNA damage and repair in somatic and germ cells in vivo.

E W Vogel1, A T Natarajan.   

Abstract

Alkylation-induced germ cell mutagenesis in the mouse versus Drosophila is compared based on data from forward mutation assays (specific-locus tests in the mouse and in Drosophila and multiple-locus assays in the latter species) but not including assays for structural chromosome aberrations. To facilitate comparisons between mouse and Drosophila, forward mutation test results have been grouped into three categories. Representatives of the first category are MMS (methyl methanesulfonate) and EO (ethylene oxide), alkylating agents with a high s value which predominantly react with ring nitrogens in DNA. ENU (N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea), MNU (N-methyl-N-nitrosourea), PRC (procarbazine), DEN (N-nitrosodiethylamine), and DMN (N-nitrosodimethylamine) belong to the second category. These agents have in common a considerable ability for modification at oxygens in DNA. Cross-linking agents (melphalan, chlorambucil, hexamethylphosphoramide) form the third category. The most unexpected, but encouraging outcome of this study is the identification of common features for three vastly different experimental indicators of genotoxicity: hereditary damage in Drosophila males, genetic damage in male mice, and tumors (TD50 estimates) in rodents. Based on the above three category classification scheme the following tentative conclusions are drawn. Monofunctional agents belonging to category 1, typified by MMS and EO, display genotoxic effects in male germ cell stages that have passed meiotic division. This phenomenon seems to be the consequence of a repair deficiency during spermiogenesis for a period of 3-4 days in Drosophila and 14 days in the mouse. We suggest that the reason for the high resistance of premeiotic stages, and the generally high TD50 estimates observed for this class in rodents, is the efficient error-free repair of N-alkylation damage. If we accept this hypothesis, then the increased carcinogenic potential in rodents, seen when comparing category 2 (ENU-type mutagens) to category 1 (MMS-type mutagens), along with the ability of category 2 genotoxins to induce genetic damage in premeiotic stages, must presumably be due to their enhanced ability for alkylations at oxygens in DNA; it is this property that actually distinguishes the two groups from each other. In contrast to category 1, examination of class 2 genotoxins (ENU and DEN) in premeiotic cells of Drosophila gave no indication for a significant role of germinal selection, and also removal by DNA repair was less dramatic compared to MMS. Thus category 2 mutagens are expected to display activity in a wide range of both post- and premeiotic germ cell stages. A number of these agents have been demonstrated to be among the most potent carcinogens in rodents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7623865     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00040-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  8 in total

1.  Molecular and phenotypic analysis of 25 recessive, homozygous-viable alleles at the mouse agouti locus.

Authors:  Rosalynn J Miltenberger; Kazumasa Wakamatsu; Shosuke Ito; Richard P Woychik; Liane B Russell; Edward J Michaud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic mechanisms of formation of radiation-induced instability of the genome and its transgenerational effects in the descendants of chronically irradiated individuals of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elena Yushkova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  ENU Mutagenesis in the Mouse.

Authors:  Rolf Stottmann; David Beier
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-14

Review 4.  Mouse ENU Mutagenesis to Understand Immunity to Infection: Methods, Selected Examples, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Grégory Caignard; Megan M Eva; Rebekah van Bruggen; Robert Eveleigh; Guillaume Bourque; Danielle Malo; Philippe Gros; Silvia M Vidal
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Arsenic trioxide inhibits glioma cell growth through induction of telomerase displacement and telomere dysfunction.

Authors:  Ye Cheng; Yunqian Li; Chengyuan Ma; Yang Song; Haiyang Xu; Hongquan Yu; Songbai Xu; Qingchun Mu; Haisong Li; Yong Chen; Gang Zhao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15

Review 6.  The various aspects of genetic and epigenetic toxicology: testing methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ning Ren; Manar Atyah; Wan-Yong Chen; Chen-Hao Zhou
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Accurate genomic variant detection in single cells with primary template-directed amplification.

Authors:  Veronica Gonzalez-Pena; Sivaraman Natarajan; Yuntao Xia; David Klein; Robert Carter; Yakun Pang; Bridget Shaner; Kavya Annu; Daniel Putnam; Wenan Chen; Jon Connelly; Shondra Pruett-Miller; Xiang Chen; John Easton; Charles Gawad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING.

Authors:  Bradley J Till; Jennifer Cooper; Thomas H Tai; Peter Colowit; Elizabeth A Greene; Steven Henikoff; Luca Comai
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.215

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.