Literature DB >> 7623378

Homeodomain proteins: what governs their ability to recognize specific DNA sequences?

A Draganescu1, J R Levin, T D Tullius.   

Abstract

Deformed (Dfd) and Ultrabithorax (Ubx) are homeodomain proteins from Drosophila melanogaster that exert regulatory effects on gene expression by binding to specific target sites in the fly genome using a helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif. The recognition helices of these two proteins are almost identical and the DNA sequences they recognize are similar, containing a conserved TAAT core sequence flanked by a somewhat variable sequence. Yet the in vivo functions of the two proteins are quite different. We have used the homeodomains of these two proteins and in vitro selected DNA binding sites to characterize the structural details of homeodomain binding to DNA and to understand the basis for the differences in sequence specificity between homeodomains with similar recognition helices. We have employed hydroxyl radical cleavage of DNA to study the positioning of the proteins on the binding sites and have analyzed the effects of missing nucleosides and purine methylation on homeodomain binding. Our results indicate that the positioning of the Ubx and Dfd homeodomains on their binding sites is consistent with reported structures of other homeodomain/DNA complexes. Dfd and Ubx bind to DNA with the recognition helix in the major groove 3' to the TAAT core sequence and the N-terminal arm in the adjacent minor groove. However, we observe striking differences between the two homeodomains in their specific interactions with DNA. Missing nucleosides within the selected binding sites have differential effects on protein binding, which are dependent on the identity of the homeodomain. Differences at the 3' end of the binding site on the top strand indicate that the N-terminal arm of a homeodomain is capable of distinguishing an A.T base-pair from T.A in the minor groove. Specific orientation of the N-terminal arm within the binding site appears to vary between the homeodomains and influences the interaction of the recognition helix with the major groove.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7623378     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  4 in total

1.  A molecular code dictates sequence-specific DNA recognition by homeodomains.

Authors:  G Damante; L Pellizzari; G Esposito; F Fogolari; P Viglino; D Fabbro; G Tell; S Formisano; R Di Lauro
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  TGIF1 homeodomain interacts with Smad MH1 domain and represses TGF-β signaling.

Authors:  Ewelina Guca; David Suñol; Lidia Ruiz; Agnieszka Konkol; Jorge Cordero; Carles Torner; Eric Aragon; Pau Martin-Malpartida; Antoni Riera; Maria J Macias
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  DNA strand breaking by the hydroxyl radical is governed by the accessible surface areas of the hydrogen atoms of the DNA backbone.

Authors:  B Balasubramanian; W K Pogozelski; T D Tullius
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multiple intrinsically disordered sequences alter DNA binding by the homeodomain of the Drosophila hox protein ultrabithorax.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Kathleen S Matthews; Sarah E Bondos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 5.157

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.