Literature DB >> 18508761

Multiple intrinsically disordered sequences alter DNA binding by the homeodomain of the Drosophila hox protein ultrabithorax.

Ying Liu1, Kathleen S Matthews, Sarah E Bondos.   

Abstract

During animal development, distinct tissues, organs, and appendages are specified through differential gene transcription by Hox transcription factors. However, the conserved Hox homeodomains bind DNA with high affinity yet low specificity. We have therefore explored the structure of the Drosophila melanogaster Hox protein Ultrabithorax and the impact of its nonhomeodomain regions on DNA binding properties. Computational and experimental approaches identified several conserved, intrinsically disordered regions outside the homeodomain of Ultrabithorax that impact DNA binding by the homeodomain. Full-length Ultrabithorax bound to target DNA 2.5-fold weaker than its isolated homeodomain. Using N-terminal and C-terminal deletion mutants, we demonstrate that the YPWM region and the disordered microexons (termed the I1 region) inhibit DNA binding approximately 2-fold, whereas the disordered I2 region inhibits homeodomain-DNA interaction a further approximately 40-fold. Binding is restored almost to homeodomain affinity by the mostly disordered N-terminal 174 amino acids (R region) in a length-dependent manner. Both the I2 and R regions contain portions of the activation domain, functionally linking DNA binding and transcription regulation. Given that (i) the I1 region and a portion of the R region alter homeodomain-DNA binding as a function of pH and (ii) an internal deletion within I1 increases Ultrabithorax-DNA affinity, I1 must directly impact homeodomain-DNA interaction energetics. However, I2 appears to indirectly affect DNA binding in a manner countered by the N terminus. The amino acid sequences of I2 and much of the I1 and R regions vary significantly among Ultrabithorax orthologues, potentially diversifying Hox-DNA interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18508761      PMCID: PMC2475714          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M800375200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  93 in total

1.  Selective constraints, amino acid composition, and the rate of protein evolution.

Authors:  N J Tourasse; W H Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  A comparison of in vivo and in vitro DNA-binding specificities suggests a new model for homeoprotein DNA binding in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  A Carr; M D Biggin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Structure of a DNA-bound Ultrabithorax-Extradenticle homeodomain complex.

Authors:  J M Passner; H D Ryoo; L Shen; R S Mann; A K Aggarwal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  The developmental and molecular biology of genes that subdivide the body of Drosophila.

Authors:  R S Mann; G Morata
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  Inhibitory module of Ets-1 allosterically regulates DNA binding through a dipole-facilitated phosphate contact.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Lawrence P McIntosh; Barbara J Graves
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-31       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila.

Authors:  E B Lewis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sequence complexity of disordered protein.

Authors:  P Romero; Z Obradovic; X Li; E C Garner; C J Brown; A K Dunker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-01-01

Review 8.  Combinatorial transcriptional regulation: the interaction of transcription factors and cell signaling molecules with homeodomain proteins in Drosophila development.

Authors:  S E Bondos; X X Tan
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.807

9.  Aberrant mobility phenomena of the DNA repair protein XPA.

Authors:  L M Iakoucheva; A L Kimzey; C D Masselon; R D Smith; A K Dunker; E J Ackerman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  A sequence motif distinct from Hox binding sites controls the specificity of a Hox response element.

Authors:  X Li; A Veraksa; W McGinnis
Journal:  Development       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and Disorder in Gene Regulation: LacI/GalR and Hox Proteins.

Authors:  Sarah E Bondos; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Xiangshu Jin; Sean M West; Rohit Joshi; Barry Honig; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 3.  Physical Chemistry of the Protein Backbone: Enabling the Mechanisms of Intrinsic Protein Disorder.

Authors:  Justin A Drake; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Thermodynamics of Conformational Transitions in a Disordered Protein Backbone Model.

Authors:  Justin A Drake; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Evolution of a derived protein-protein interaction between HoxA11 and Foxo1a in mammals caused by changes in intramolecular regulation.

Authors:  Kathryn J Brayer; Vincent J Lynch; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Identification of multiple dityrosine bonds in materials composed of the Drosophila protein Ultrabithorax.

Authors:  David W Howell; Shang-Pu Tsai; Kelly Churion; Jan Patterson; Colette Abbey; Joshua T Atkinson; Dustin Porterpan; Yil-Hwan You; Kenith E Meissner; Kayla J Bayless; Sarah E Bondos
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  Interactions of the acidic domain and SRF interacting motifs with the NKX3.1 homeodomain.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Ju; Jin-Soo Maeng; Duck-Yeon Lee; Grzegorz Piszczek; Edward P Gelmann; James M Gruschus
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  An activating interaction between the unphosphorylated n-terminus of human liver pyruvate kinase and the main body of the protein is interrupted by phosphorylation.

Authors:  Aron W Fenton; Qingling Tang
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Internal regulatory interactions determine DNA binding specificity by a Hox transcription factor.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Kathleen S Matthews; Sarah E Bondos
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  The intrinsically disordered regions of the Drosophila melanogaster Hox protein ultrabithorax select interacting proteins based on partner topology.

Authors:  Hao-Ching Hsiao; Kim L Gonzalez; Daniel J Catanese; Kristopher E Jordy; Kathleen S Matthews; Sarah E Bondos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.