Literature DB >> 7622103

Staging laparotomy for endometrial carcinoma: assessment of retroperitoneal lymph nodes.

L Chuang1, T W Burke, C Tornos, B D Marino, M F Mitchell, G Tortolero-Luna, C Levenback, M Morris, D M Gershenson.   

Abstract

The surgical staging scheme for uterine corpus cancer adopted in 1988 by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics assigns patients with tumor spread to retroperitoneal lymph nodes to stage IIIC. However, a recommended approach to the detection of lymph node metastasis is not delineated. As part of an ongoing project to assess the value of surgical staging procedures, we reviewed the techniques of lymph node evaluation in 295 at-risk patients. Cases included clinical stage I patients whose preoperative biopsies demonstrated grade 2 or 3 adenocarcinoma or papillary serous, clear cell, or mixed carcinoma. We arbitrarily divided the retroperitoneal space into 10 lymphatic zones: left and right para-aortic, common iliac, external iliac, hypogastric, and obturator. Eighty-two percent of patients had some type of node sampling that involved a mean of three zones. Thirty-three of 244 sampled cases (13.5%) had nodal metastases: 20 had gross involvement and 13 had microscopic. We stratified patients into three groups: (1) those who had no node sampling (n = 51), (2) those with some nodes biopsied (n = 193), and (3) those whose node sampling included a minimum of one para-aortic plus at least one right and left pelvic specimen (n = 51). Retroperitoneal recurrences thought to originate from lymph node sites were identified for the "node-negative" patients in each group: Group 1, 4/51 (8%); Group 2, 9/173 (5%); and Group 3, 0/38 (0%). Lymphatic site failures were seen in 8 of 33 (24%) patients with biopsy-proven metastases. We found that failure to systematically sample pelvic and para-aortic nodes results in a small, but real, risk of undetected extrauterine metastasis. A selective approach to sampling that includes biopsy from both para-aortic and bilateral pelvic lymphatic zones appears to provide an accurate estimate of true node negativity. Further evaluation of this approach is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7622103     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  10 in total

Review 1.  Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Trends in the utilization of adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy and/or external beam radiation treatment in stage I and II endometrial cancer: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results study.

Authors:  Mehul K Patel; Michele L Cote; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Thomas Buekers; Adnan R Munkarah; Mohamed A Elshaikh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Serum CA 125 levels and lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Iztok Takac; Borut Gorisek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Mariam M AlHilli; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Improving locoregional outcome in high-intermediate-risk and high-risk stage I endometrial cancer with surgical staging followed by brachytherapy.

Authors:  Candan Demiroz Abakay; Sonay Arslan; Meral Kurt; Sibel Cetintas
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 6.  Endometrial cancer: treatment of nodal metastases.

Authors:  D Scott McMeekin; Todd Tillmanns
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-04

7.  Treatment of node-positive endometrial cancer with complete node dissection, chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Authors:  T Onda; H Yoshikawa; K Mizutani; M Mishima; H Yokota; H Nagano; Y Ozaki; A Murakami; K Ueda; Y Taketani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Comparison Between Laparoscopy and Laparotomy in Systematic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Tomohito Tanaka; Yoshito Terai; Shigenori Hayashi; Daisuke Aoki; Michiyasu Miki; Eiji Kobayashi; Tadashi Kimura; Tsukasa Baba; Noriomi Matsumura; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

Review 9.  Endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  W K Huh; J M Straughn; F J Kelly; L C Kilgore
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2001-04

10.  Lymphadenectomy and adjuvant therapy in endometrial carcinoma: role of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  I Otsuka; T Kubota; T Aso
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.