Literature DB >> 12594938

Endometrial cancer: treatment of nodal metastases.

D Scott McMeekin1, Todd Tillmanns.   

Abstract

Surgical staging has changed the method by which patients with endometrial cancer are managed. Before the routine use of lymph node dissection, patients were presumed to have nodal disease based on imaging studies, palpation, and biopsy. The move to a surgically based staging system in 1988 created a new subgroup of patients who had documented nodal disease. The risk of nodal involvement is related primarily to tumor grade and depth of myometrial invasion. Although patients with nodal disease are uncommon, treatment of these patients poses multiple challenges. It is our belief that unless nodes are surgically assessed, the clinician will not know whether the nodes are involved. A thorough lymphadenectomy with removal of nodal tissue from multiple pelvic sites and from bilateral para-aortic regions is recommended for most patients with endometrial cancer. Identification of positive nodes allows appropriate postoperative therapies to be used, and data support that nodal dissection may be therapeutic and prognostic. Patients with positive nodes should receive radiation therapy directed to the nodal distribution, with patients having involved para-aortic nodes receiving an extended field. Whole abdominal radiation has been used, especially in patients with adnexal disease or positive cytology. The role of whole abdominal radiation remains in question. The most promising treatment option is combination therapy with sequential radiation and chemotherapy. Active chemotherapy agents in endometrial cancer are doxorubicin, cisplatin, and paclitaxel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12594938     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-003-0013-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  17 in total

1.  Conservative management of stage I endometrial carcinoma after surgical staging.

Authors:  J Michael Straughn; Warner K Huh; F Joseph Kelly; Charles A Leath; Marc J Kleinberg; Johnny Hyde; T Michael Numnum; Yuting Zhang; Seng-Jaw Soong; J Maxwell Austin; Edward E Partridge; Larry C Kilgore; Ronald D Alvarez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node-positive endometrial cancer.

Authors:  A Mariani; M J Webb; L Galli; K C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  W T Creasman; C P Morrow; B N Bundy; H D Homesley; J E Graham; P B Heller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.

Authors:  D R Scribner; J L Walker; G A Johnson; S D McMeekin; M A Gold; R S Mannel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma with metastases confined to pelvic lymph nodes: analysis of treatment outcomes, prognostic variables, and failure patterns following adjuvant radiation therapy.

Authors:  G Nelson; M Randall; G Sutton; D Moore; J Hurteau; K Look
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Stage III endometrial cancer: analysis of prognostic factors and failure patterns after adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Y Aoki; H Kase; M Watanabe; T Sato; H Kurata; K Tanaka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Doxorubicin as an adjuvant following surgery and radiation therapy in patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma, stage I and occult stage II: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  C P Morrow; B N Bundy; H D Homesley; W T Creasman; N B Hornback; R Kurman; J T Thigpen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  J V Bokhman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Relationship between surgical-pathological risk factors and outcome in clinical stage I and II carcinoma of the endometrium: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  C P Morrow; B N Bundy; R J Kurman; W T Creasman; P Heller; H D Homesley; J E Graham
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Postoperative adjuvant cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (PAC) chemotherapy in women with high-risk endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  T W Burke; D M Gershenson; M Morris; C A Stringer; C Levenback; G Tortolero-Luna; V V Baker
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  1 in total

1.  The impact of complete embedding of remaining tissue in gynecological lymph node dissection specimen in surgical pathology on lymph node yield: is it clinically relevant?

Authors:  Julia Andruszkow; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein; Brigitte Winkler; Benjamin Bruno; Ruth Knüchel; Jörg Jäkel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.