Literature DB >> 7620643

Activation time determination by high-resolution unipolar and bipolar extracellular electrograms in the canine heart.

G Ndrepepa1, E B Caref, H Yin, N el-Sherif, M Restivo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To identify the optimal criteria for activation time (AT) determination of bipolar electrograms from normal hearts, a high-resolution cross electrode array comprising 128 unipolar electrodes of 500-microns spacing was used to record extracellular potentials from the left ventricular epicardium of 12 dog hearts. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Recordings were made during broad wavefront propagation (B wave) and local elliptical wavefront propagation (E wave). Characteristics of 863 bipolar electrograms (1-mm spacing) were constructed from unipolar data standardized for differences in polarity, then classified morphologically. Features for bipolar AT determination were compared to the time of the negative peak of the first temporal derivative of a unipolar electrogram situated mid-way between the bipoles. During B wave, three distinct morphologies were observed: uniphasic (61%), biphasic (23%), and triphasic (16%). Peak voltage of uniphasic and triphasic signals was the best predictor of AT (error: 0.6 +/- 0.6 msec and 0.6 +/- 0.8 msec, respectively). During E wave, parallel orientation of the bipoles with respect to the direction of impulse propagation wavefront resulted in uniphasic signals (> 99%), while for perpendicular orientation of the bipoles, electrogram morphology was variable. For parallel orientation of the bipoles, peak negative voltage was the best predictor of AT for both longitudinal and transverse propagation, while for perpendicular bipole orientation, peak negative voltage was a less reliable predictor for propagation along both fiber axes. Increasing interpolar distance resulted in a degradation in AT accuracy for B wave (from 0.6 +/- 0.6 msec at 1 mm to 1.1 +/- 1.2 msec at 7 mm) and for E wave (from 0.4 +/- 0.3 msec at 1 mm to 3.1 +/- 2.9 msec at 7 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: (1) The accuracy of bipolar electrograms is sensitive to wavefront direction, bipole orientation, and interpolar distance; (2) peak negative voltage of uniphasic and triphasic signals is a reliable predictor of AT, but only for B wave; (3) a maximum interpolar distance of 2 mm and bipole orientation parallel to the direction of the impulse wavefront are minimally required for accurate determination of AT during impulse propagation initiated near the recording electrodes; and (4) for impulses initiated near the recording site in normal tissue, a biphasic or triphasic morphology almost certainly indicates that the bipolar electrode is oriented perpendicular to the wavefront direction, irrespective of fiber orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7620643     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1995.tb00769.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  12 in total

1.  Activation mapping of focal atrial tachycardia: the impact of the method for estimating activation time.

Authors:  Ioan Liuba; Håkan Walfridsson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Mechanism and magnitude of bipolar electrogram directional sensitivity: Characterizing underlying determinants of bipolar amplitude.

Authors:  Stephen Gaeta; Tristram D Bahnson; Craig Henriquez
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Measure of synchronisation of right atrial depolarisation wavefronts during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  V Barbaro; P Bartolini; G Calcagnini; F Censi; A Michelucci
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Time- and frequency-domain analyses of atrial fibrillation activation rate: the optical mapping reference.

Authors:  Omer Berenfeld; Steve Ennis; Elliot Hwang; Brian Hooven; Krzysztof Grzeda; Sergey Mironov; Masatoshi Yamazaki; Jérôme Kalifa; José Jalife
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Relationship between left atrium catheter contact force and pacing threshold.

Authors:  Teresa Barrio-López; Mercedes Ortiz; Eduardo Castellanos; Carla Lázaro; Jefferson Salas; Sergio Madero; Jesús Almendral
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Catheter based simultaneous mapping of cardiac activation and motion: a review.

Authors:  Hanno U Klemm; Olaf Franzen; Rodolfo Ventura; Stephan Willems
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2007-08-01

7.  Techniques for automated local activation time annotation and conduction velocity estimation in cardiac mapping.

Authors:  C D Cantwell; C H Roney; F S Ng; J H Siggers; S J Sherwin; N S Peters
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.589

8.  Measurement bias in activation-recovery intervals from unipolar electrograms.

Authors:  David Western; Ben Hanson; Peter Taggart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.733

9.  Mini Electrodes on Ablation Catheters: Valuable Addition or Redundant Information?-Insights from a Computational Study.

Authors:  Stefan Pollnow; Joachim Greiner; Tobias Oesterlein; Eike M Wülfers; Axel Loewe; Olaf Dössel
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation.

Authors:  Sanjiv M Narayan; Junaid A B Zaman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.