Literature DB >> 7618613

Gender-related differences in reperfusion treatment allocation and outcome for acute myocardial infarction.

J L Vacek1, L R Handlin, T L Rosamond, G Beauchamp.   

Abstract

Gender-related differences in outcome after myocardial infarction may relate to biased treatment allocation. To address this concern we analyzed 573 patients presenting with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and treated within 6 hours with reperfusion therapy. Two-hundred eighty patients (49%) received direct coronary angioplasty, whereas 293 (51%) received thrombolytics followed by angioplasty (p = NS). Seventy-four percent were men and 26% were women (p = NS for differences in sex distribution between the 2 treatment groups). Women were older in both groups (p < 0.01). Inferior AMI was seen more often in women (64% of direct angioplasty, 71% of lytic first) than in men (51% and 59%, respectively; p < 0.03). There was no gender-related differences in presence of multivessel coronary artery disease, prior AMI, prior bypass surgery, baseline ejection fraction, percentage of patients with ejection fraction < or = 40%, number of narrowings dilated, or angioplasty success. Patients who underwent direct angioplasty had more multivessel disease (p < 0.001) and prior coronary artery bypass surgery (p = 0.002). After a mean follow-up of 129 +/- 113 weeks, no gender-related differences were seen in the need for cardiac catheterization, documented restenosis, AMI, coronary artery bypass surgery, clinical ischemia, or death. Patients treated with direct angioplasty were more likely to undergo coronary artery bypass surgery (p < 0.05) or to die (p < 0.01). Thus, women undergoing reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation were older than men, with a higher frequency of inferior wall AMI. No specific gender-related bias in treatment allocation was evident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7618613     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80070-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  A two way view of gender bias in medicine.

Authors:  M T Ruiz; L M Verbrugge
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Age difference explains gender difference in cardiac intervention rates after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Randall R Fransoo; Patricia J Martens; Heather J Prior; Elaine Burland; Dan Château; Alan Katz
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

Review 3.  A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Kaberi Dasgupta; Veena Guru; Karin H Humphries; Jennifer McGrath; Colleen Norris; Doreen Rabi; Johanne Tremblay; Arsham Alamian; Tracie Barnett; Jafna Cox; William Amin Ghali; Sherry Grace; Pavel Hamet; Teresa Ho; Susan Kirkland; Marie Lambert; Danielle Libersan; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Gilles Paradis; Milan Petrovich; Vicky Tagalakis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Gender differences in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Oliver Koeth; Ralf Zahn; Tobias Heer; Timm Bauer; Claus Juenger; Bärbel Klein; Anselm Kai Gitt; Jochen Senges; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: does age or race matter?

Authors:  Carol R Regueiro; Nikita Gill; Alison Hart; Linda Crawshaw; Teresa Hentosz; Richard P Shannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.300

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.