Literature DB >> 7618577

Disclosure of imaging findings to patients directly by radiologists: survey of patients' preferences.

M H Schreiber1, M Leonard, C Y Rieniets.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if patients prefer to have radiologists tell them imaging findings immediately after the examination or if they prefer to hear the results later from their referring physician. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A simple questionnaire was devised and distributed to 261 consecutive patients in the radiology department of a large university hospital. During a 10-day period, patients seen in several departmental sections (gastrointestinal, genitourinary, CT, sonography, mammography, chest, musculoskeletal) completed the questionnaire. Patients were asked if they wanted the radiologist to tell them if the results were normal; if the results were abnormal; if they would prefer to hear the results from their family doctor, internist, or other primary care provider; and if they felt entitled to an explanation of their test results. Results were tabulated and expressed as percentages.
RESULTS: Analysis of the 261 questionnaires disclosed that 92% of patients wanted the radiologist to tell them if the results are normal. An additional 7% answered "Yes, but only if I ask." If the results are abnormal (cancer, for example), 87% wanted the radiologist to tell them. An additional 7% answered "Yes, but only if I ask."
CONCLUSION: Our results show that most patients prefer to hear the results of imaging examinations from the radiologist at the time of the procedure rather than to hear them later from the referring physician, regardless of the findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7618577     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

1.  The role of a consultant radiologist--are patients still in the dark?

Authors:  L Grant; N Griffin; S McDonald; H Vargas; F Hampson; J C Vasconcelos; R Sinnatamby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The radiological report... and then what?

Authors:  E Comino
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Doctor-patient communication in radiology: a great opportunity for future radiology.

Authors:  M Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Direct reporting of laboratory test results to patients by mail to enhance patient safety.

Authors:  Sharon Sung; Valerie Forman-Hoffman; Mark C Wilson; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Who's the doctor? Patients' perceptions of the role of the breast radiologist: a lesson for all radiologists.

Authors:  N O'Mahony; E McCarthy; R McDermott; S O'Keeffe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Reviewing imaging examination results with a radiologist immediately after study completion: patient preferences and assessment of feasibility in an academic department.

Authors:  Jay Pahade; Corey Couto; Roger B Davis; Payal Patel; Bettina Siewert; Max P Rosen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Radiologist, obstetric patient, and emergency department provider survey: radiologist-patient interaction in the emergency department setting.

Authors:  David B Erlichman; Marjorie W Stein; Amanda Weiss; Fernanda Mazzariol
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-03-10

8.  An assessment of the likelihood, frequency, and content of verbal communication between radiologists and women receiving screening and diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Mark Kettler; Andrea J Cook; Berta M Geller; Leah Karliner; Diana L Miglioretti; Erin Aiello Bowles; Diana S Buist; Thomas H Gallagher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Assessment of follow-up completeness and notification preferences for imaging findings of possible cancer: what happens after radiologists submit their reports?

Authors:  Caroline E Sloan; Seetharam C Chadalavada; Tessa S Cook; Curtis P Langlotz; Mitchell D Schnall; Hanna M Zafar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Patient experiences and preferences: development of practice guidelines in a cancer imaging department.

Authors:  L Ollivier; F Apiou; J Leclère; M Sévellec; B Asselain; A Brédart; S Neuenschwander
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.