Literature DB >> 22932065

Who's the doctor? Patients' perceptions of the role of the breast radiologist: a lesson for all radiologists.

N O'Mahony1, E McCarthy, R McDermott, S O'Keeffe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore patients' perceptions of the role of the radiologist in their care.
METHODS: The questionnaire used was designed in conjunction with a psychologist who had an interest in oncology, and piloted. The final questionnaires were distributed to patients attending the breast clinic at St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, from 1 March to 1 July 2011. Patients requiring imaging (mammography and/or ultrasound) were asked to complete the same questionnaire again after imaging procedures were performed. Paired t-tests were used to assess for changes in parameters, including ranking of members of the breast care team in order of perceived importance and levels of anxiety pre and post consultation with the radiologist.
RESULTS: 306 patients were recruited. 76% of patients thought that radiologists were radiographers and only 14% knew that radiologists were medical doctors. Nearly 40% of patients did not consider that radiologists had a role to play in their care. There was no statistically significant difference in the ranking of team members pre and post consultation. There was a significant improvement in patient anxiety levels after consultation with the breast radiologist, which is likely to be due to the patient learning the outcome of tests performed.
CONCLUSION: There is a lack of awareness amongst patients and amongst our colleagues in paramedical disciplines regarding the roles and responsibilities of the modern radiologist. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiology must act to increase public awareness so that future changes in the health service will reflect the scope and importance of the speciality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22932065      PMCID: PMC3611722          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/74006772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  8 in total

Review 1.  Radiology at the turn of the millennium.

Authors:  A R Margulis; J H Sunshine
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Interventional radiologic procedures: patient anxiety, perception of pain, understanding of procedure, and satisfaction with medication--a prospective study.

Authors:  P R Mueller; S Biswal; E F Halpern; J A Kaufman; M J Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The role of a consultant radiologist--are patients still in the dark?

Authors:  L Grant; N Griffin; S McDonald; H Vargas; F Hampson; J C Vasconcelos; R Sinnatamby
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The radiologist in the 1990s: new practice expectations and management responsibilities.

Authors:  J H Thrall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Psychological distress in healthy women with familial breast cancer: like mother, like daughter?

Authors:  L Baider; P Ever-Hadani; A Kaplan De-Nour
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.210

6.  Disclosure of imaging findings to patients directly by radiologists: survey of patients' preferences.

Authors:  M H Schreiber; M Leonard; C Y Rieniets
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The informational roles and psychological health of members of 10 oncology multidisciplinary teams in the UK.

Authors:  S Catt; L Fallowfield; V Jenkins; C Langridge; A Cox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care?

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Regine Heiland; Sonja Sudarski; Johannes M Froehlich; Klaus Hergan; Matthias Meissnitzer; Sebastian Kos; Peter Bertke; Orpheus Kolokythas; Dow M Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Trends in ultrasound examination in family practice.

Authors:  Ali F Alamri; Israr Khan; Mirza I A Baig; Rahila Iftikhar
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2014-05

3.  "I was seen by a radiologist, but unfortunately I can't remember the name and I still have questions. What should I do?" Radiologists should give thoughts to improve service professionalism and patient esteem.

Authors:  Andreas Gutzeit; Arne Fischmann; Rosemarie Forstner; Romana Goette; Bernhard Herzog; Claudia Kurtz; Chantal Hebler; Andrea Ladinger; Johannes M Froehlich; Janusch Blautzik; Orpheus Kolokythas; Simon Matoori; Sebastian Kos; Carolin Reischauer; Hubert Schefer; Peter Dubsky; Simon Peter Gampenrieder; Klaus Hergan; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Dow-Mu Koh; Matthias Meissnitzer
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Getting Rid of Patient's Misconceptions About the Radiology Department Using Animated Video in the Waiting Room.

Authors:  Michel Lavaerts; Hilde Vandenhout; Raymond Oyen; Chantal Van Ongeval
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 1.894

5.  Humor in radiological breast cancer screening: a way of improving patient service?

Authors:  Selina Largiader; Andreas Gutzeit; Elisabeth Sartoretti; Thomas Sartoretti; Dow Mu Koh; Sabine Sartoretti-Schefer; Sebastian Kos; Romana Goette; Ricardo Donners; Robyn Benz; Johannes M Froehlich; Simon Matoori; Peter Dubsky; Tino Plümecke; Rosemarie Forstner; Willibald Ruch; Matthias Meissnitzer; Klaus Hergan
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 5.605

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.