PURPOSE: To evaluate sensitivity, specificity, clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR studies of 62 feet (diabetics [n = 27], nondiabetics [n = 35]) in 59 patients were prospectively evaluated to detect the presence and extent of osteomyelitis. Biopsy (n = 41 feet) and clinical follow-up (n = 62 feet) were used to establish the diagnosis, select treatment, and determine outcome; sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging were calculated. A cost analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis were 82% and 80%, respectively, in diabetics and 89% and 94%, respectively, in nondiabetics. There was no recurrent infection at the surgical margin in 13 feet in which the area of limited resection had been delineated at MR imaging. CONCLUSION: MR imaging shows good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing osteomyelitis in diabetic feet, and it is competitively priced compared with other imaging modalities. Accurate delineation of extent allows limited surgical resection, making MR imaging clinically useful and cost-effective.
PURPOSE: To evaluate sensitivity, specificity, clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR studies of 62 feet (diabetics [n = 27], nondiabetics [n = 35]) in 59 patients were prospectively evaluated to detect the presence and extent of osteomyelitis. Biopsy (n = 41 feet) and clinical follow-up (n = 62 feet) were used to establish the diagnosis, select treatment, and determine outcome; sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging were calculated. A cost analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis were 82% and 80%, respectively, in diabetics and 89% and 94%, respectively, in nondiabetics. There was no recurrent infection at the surgical margin in 13 feet in which the area of limited resection had been delineated at MR imaging. CONCLUSION: MR imaging shows good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing osteomyelitis in diabetic feet, and it is competitively priced compared with other imaging modalities. Accurate delineation of extent allows limited surgical resection, making MR imaging clinically useful and cost-effective.
Authors: Adam D Singer; Monica Umpierrez; Aparna Kakarala; Marcos C Schechter; Michael Maceroli; Gulshan B Sharma; Ravi R Rajani Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: William A Erdman; Ji Buethe; Rafia Bhore; Hans K Ghayee; Chiarra Thompson; Param Maewal; Jon Anderson; Steve Klemow; Orhan K Oz Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 19.112