Literature DB >> 7617791

Diagnostic prediction rules: principles, requirements and pitfalls.

J A Knottnerus1.   

Abstract

This article focuses on the background, principles, requirements, and pitfalls of diagnostic prediction rules. Useful rules can only be derived from methodologically valid data bases. By considering the possibilities and limitations of prediction rules, the author concludes that these rules may support medical decision making, but cannot be a substitute for clinical skills and solid pathophysiologic knowledge.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7617791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Care        ISSN: 0095-4543            Impact factor:   2.907


  14 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and general practice.

Authors:  N Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality.

Authors:  H C de Vet; T van der Weijden; J W Muris; J Heyrman; F Buntinx; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  "Potential pitfalls of clinical prediction rules" cook C. J man manip ther 2008;16:69-71.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Brismée; Phillip Sizer
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

4.  Potential pitfalls of clinical prediction rules.

Authors:  Chad E Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

5.  Effects of pruning of a decision-tree for the ear, nose, and throat realm in primary health care based on case-notes.

Authors:  T af Klercker
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 6.  Assessing patients with possible heart disease using scores.

Authors:  K Shetler; A Karlsdottir; V Froelicher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Effectiveness of mechanical diagnosis and therapy in patients with back pain who meet a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Ron Schenk; Carol Dionne; Corey Simon; Robert Johnson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-02

Review 8.  Does clinical examination aid in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in women? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Medina-Bombardó; Antoni Jover-Palmer
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.

Authors:  G S Collins; J B Reitsma; D G Altman; K G M Moons
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A simplified approach to the pooled analysis of calibration of clinical prediction rules for systematic reviews of validation studies.

Authors:  Borislav D Dimitrov; Nicola Motterlini; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.