Literature DB >> 19119406

"Potential pitfalls of clinical prediction rules" cook C. J man manip ther 2008;16:69-71.

Jean-Michel Brismée1, Phillip Sizer.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID： 19119406      PMCID： PMC2582425     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN： 1066-9817


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement.

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-07

Review 3.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Authors:  A Laupacis; N Sekar; I G Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Diagnostic prediction rules: principles, requirements and pitfalls.

Authors:  J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.907

Review 5.  The risk of determining risk with multivariable models.

Authors:  J Concato; A R Feinstein; T R Holford
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Penny Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 4.615
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Systematic review of clinical prediction tools and prognostic factors in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Lo; Hitoshi Fukuda; Yusuke Nishimura; Forough Farrokhyar; Lehana Thabane; Mitchell A H Levine
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-08-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.