Literature DB >> 7617420

Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo.

J T Todd1, J S Tittle, J F Norman.   

Abstract

A fundamental issue in the study of human vision is the accuracy with which observers can perceive the three-dimensional structures of objects in the environment. The formal mapping from physical to perceived space is considered as a geometric transformation, and the literature is reviewed to identify which aspects of object structure are systematically distorted by this transformation and which ones remain invariant. In the perceptual analysis of several different sources of optical information, including motion and stereo, both individually and in combination, there is a consistent pattern of results to indicate that perceived depth intervals are scaled differently from comparable intervals in either horizontal or vertical directions. These and other findings provide strong evidence that the relationship between physical and perceived space is noneuclidean, and that the three-dimensional structures of objects can appear systematically distorted even when viewed under full cue conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7617420     DOI: 10.1068/p240075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Large perspective changes yield perception of metric shape that allows accurate feedforward reaches-to-grasp and it persists after the optic flow has stopped!

Authors:  Young-Lim Lee; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Lack of depth constancy for grasping movements in both virtual and real environments.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Grasping reveals visual misjudgements of shape.

Authors:  Raymond H Cuijpers; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Perception of relative throw-ability.

Authors:  Qin Zhu; Todd Mirich; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: proportional rate control using relative disparity tau.

Authors:  Joe Anderson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A Binocular Information Source for Size Perception.

Authors:  Nam-Gyoon Kim
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-04

8.  Differentiating between Affine and Perspective-Based Models for the Geometry of Visual Space Based on Judgments of the Interior Angles of Squares.

Authors:  Mark Wagner; Gary Hatfield; Kelly Cassese; Alexis N Makwinski
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-02

Review 9.  What is binocular disparity?

Authors:  Joseph S Lappin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-12

10.  Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; David R Wozny; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.