Literature DB >> 7615375

How significant are serial bone scans in monitoring advanced prostatic cancer?

S Tekgül1, H Ozen, R Ozyavuz, M Bakkaloğlu, D Remzi.   

Abstract

We report a total of 169 serial bone scan studies conducted in 21 patients with histologically proven metastatic cancer of the prostate. Aim of the study was to investigate the concordance of findings on bone scans with serum acid phosphate (AP) levels and the clinical performance status (CPS) of the patients, and to see how important bone scan is by itself in determining the metastatic progression in the follow-up. Eighty-seven and 86% of scans demonstrated changes concordant with AP and CPS levels subsequently. It was also found that 100% of the progressions on bone scans along with elevated levels of AP had been confirmed as metastatic progression, whereas only 41% of progressions on bone scans solely had been shown to be metastases in the follow-up investigations. Findings on bone scans not in correlation with clinical findings and serum AP levels are mostly misleading. Use of bone scans in conjunction with serum AP levels and most probably with prostate-specific antigen and CPS is the most reliable and therefore treatment modality changes should not be based on bone scans only.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7615375     DOI: 10.1007/BF02575225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  7 in total

1.  Nuclear bone imaging in metastatic cancer of the prostate.

Authors:  J J Pollen; K Gerber; W L Ashburn; J D Schmidt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Do bone scans predict prognosis in prostatic cancer? A report of the EORTC protocol 30762.

Authors:  F Lund; P H Smith; S Suciu
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1984-02

3.  Predicting radionuclide bone scan findings in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer: prostate specific antigen is superior to all other clinical parameters.

Authors:  F M Chybowski; J J Keller; E J Bergstralh; J E Oesterling
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Some limitations of the radioisotope bone scan in patients with metastatic prostatic cancer. A subanalysis of EORTC trial 30853. The EORTC Urological Group.

Authors:  P H Smith; A Bono; F Calais da Silva; F Debruyne; L Denis; P Robinson; R Sylvester; T G Armitage
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Comparative value of bone scintigraphy and radiography in monitoring tumor response in systemically treated prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  R M Levenson; B J Sauerbrunn; H R Bates; R D Newman; J L Eddy; D C Ihde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparison of enzyme, clinical, radiographic, and radionuclide methods of detecting bone metastases from carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  D L Schaffer; H P Pendergrass
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Serial bone scanning: the assessment of treatment response in carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; A R Constable; T Sherwood; J J Stephenson; G D Chisholm; E P O'Donoghue
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1978-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.